In redismodule.h, RedisModule_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient returns void
`void REDISMODULE_API_FUNC(RedisModule_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient)(RedisModuleCtx *ctx, uint64_t client_id);`
But in module.c, RM_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient returns int
`int RM_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient(RedisModuleCtx *ctx, uint64_t client_id)`
It it safe to change return value from `void` to `int` from the user's perspective.
In redismodule.h, RedisModule_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient returns void
`void REDISMODULE_API_FUNC(RedisModule_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient)(RedisModuleCtx *ctx, uint64_t client_id);`
But in module.c, RM_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient returns int
`int RM_DeauthenticateAndCloseClient(RedisModuleCtx *ctx, uint64_t client_id)`
It it safe to change return value from `void` to `int` from the user's perspective.
Added RedisModule_HoldString that either returns a
shallow copy of the given String (by increasing
the String ref count) or a new deep copy of String
in case its not possible to get a shallow copy.
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
Added RedisModule_HoldString that either returns a
shallow copy of the given String (by increasing
the String ref count) or a new deep copy of String
in case its not possible to get a shallow copy.
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
Add logic to redis-cli to display RESP3 PUSH messages when we detect
STDOUT is a tty, with an optional command-line argument to override
the default behavior.
The new argument: --show-pushes <yn>
Examples:
$ redis-cli -3 --show-pushes no
$ echo "client tracking on\nget k1\nset k1 v1"| redis-cli -3 --show-pushes y
Add logic to redis-cli to display RESP3 PUSH messages when we detect
STDOUT is a tty, with an optional command-line argument to override
the default behavior.
The new argument: --show-pushes <yn>
Examples:
$ redis-cli -3 --show-pushes no
$ echo "client tracking on\nget k1\nset k1 v1"| redis-cli -3 --show-pushes y
Before this fix we where attempting to select a db before creating db the DB, see: #7323
This issue doesn't seem to have any implications, since the selected DB index is 0,
the db pointer remains NULL, and will later be correctly set before using this dummy
client for the first time.
As we know, we call 'moduleInitModulesSystem()' before 'initServer()'. We will allocate
memory for server.db in 'initServer', but we call 'createClient()' that will call 'selectDb()'
in 'moduleInitModulesSystem()', before the databases where created. Instead, we should call
'createClient()' for moduleFreeContextReusedClient after 'initServer()'.
Before this fix we where attempting to select a db before creating db the DB, see: #7323
This issue doesn't seem to have any implications, since the selected DB index is 0,
the db pointer remains NULL, and will later be correctly set before using this dummy
client for the first time.
As we know, we call 'moduleInitModulesSystem()' before 'initServer()'. We will allocate
memory for server.db in 'initServer', but we call 'createClient()' that will call 'selectDb()'
in 'moduleInitModulesSystem()', before the databases where created. Instead, we should call
'createClient()' for moduleFreeContextReusedClient after 'initServer()'.
Diskless master has some inherent latencies.
1) fork starts with delay from cron rather than immediately
2) replica is put online only after an ACK. but the ACK
was sent only once a second.
3) but even if it would arrive immediately, it will not
register in case cron didn't yet detect that the fork is done.
Besides that, when a replica disconnects, it doesn't immediately
attempts to re-connect, it waits for replication cron (one per second).
in case it was already online, it may be important to try to re-connect
as soon as possible, so that the backlog at the master doesn't vanish.
In case it disconnected during rdb transfer, one can argue that it's
not very important to re-connect immediately, but this is needed for the
"diskless loading short read" test to be able to run 100 iterations in 5
seconds, rather than 3 (waiting for replication cron re-connection)
changes in this commit:
1) sync command starts a fork immediately if no sync_delay is configured
2) replica sends REPLCONF ACK when done reading the rdb (rather than on 1s cron)
3) when a replica unexpectedly disconnets, it immediately tries to
re-connect rather than waiting 1s
4) when when a child exits, if there is another replica waiting, we spawn a new
one right away, instead of waiting for 1s replicationCron.
5) added a call to connectWithMaster from replicationSetMaster. which is called
from the REPLICAOF command but also in 3 places in cluster.c, in all of
these the connection attempt will now be immediate instead of delayed by 1
second.
side note:
we can add a call to rdbPipeReadHandler in replconfCommand when getting
a REPLCONF ACK from the replica to solve a race where the replica got
the entire rdb and EOF marker before we detected that the pipe was
closed.
in the test i did see this race happens in one about of some 300 runs,
but i concluded that this race is unlikely in real life (where the
replica is on another host and we're more likely to first detect the
pipe was closed.
the test runs 100 iterations in 3 seconds, so in some cases it'll take 4
seconds instead (waiting for another REPLCONF ACK).
Removing unneeded startBgsaveForReplication from updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave
Now that CheckChildrenDone is calling the new replicationStartPendingFork
(extracted from serverCron) there's actually no need to call
startBgsaveForReplication from updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave anymore,
since as soon as updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave returns, CheckChildrenDone is
calling replicationStartPendingFork that handles that anyway.
The code in updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave had a bug in which it ignored
repl-diskless-sync-delay, but removing that code shows that this bug was
hiding another bug, which is that the max_idle should have used >= and
not >, this one second delay has a big impact on my new test.
Diskless master has some inherent latencies.
1) fork starts with delay from cron rather than immediately
2) replica is put online only after an ACK. but the ACK
was sent only once a second.
3) but even if it would arrive immediately, it will not
register in case cron didn't yet detect that the fork is done.
Besides that, when a replica disconnects, it doesn't immediately
attempts to re-connect, it waits for replication cron (one per second).
in case it was already online, it may be important to try to re-connect
as soon as possible, so that the backlog at the master doesn't vanish.
In case it disconnected during rdb transfer, one can argue that it's
not very important to re-connect immediately, but this is needed for the
"diskless loading short read" test to be able to run 100 iterations in 5
seconds, rather than 3 (waiting for replication cron re-connection)
changes in this commit:
1) sync command starts a fork immediately if no sync_delay is configured
2) replica sends REPLCONF ACK when done reading the rdb (rather than on 1s cron)
3) when a replica unexpectedly disconnets, it immediately tries to
re-connect rather than waiting 1s
4) when when a child exits, if there is another replica waiting, we spawn a new
one right away, instead of waiting for 1s replicationCron.
5) added a call to connectWithMaster from replicationSetMaster. which is called
from the REPLICAOF command but also in 3 places in cluster.c, in all of
these the connection attempt will now be immediate instead of delayed by 1
second.
side note:
we can add a call to rdbPipeReadHandler in replconfCommand when getting
a REPLCONF ACK from the replica to solve a race where the replica got
the entire rdb and EOF marker before we detected that the pipe was
closed.
in the test i did see this race happens in one about of some 300 runs,
but i concluded that this race is unlikely in real life (where the
replica is on another host and we're more likely to first detect the
pipe was closed.
the test runs 100 iterations in 3 seconds, so in some cases it'll take 4
seconds instead (waiting for another REPLCONF ACK).
Removing unneeded startBgsaveForReplication from updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave
Now that CheckChildrenDone is calling the new replicationStartPendingFork
(extracted from serverCron) there's actually no need to call
startBgsaveForReplication from updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave anymore,
since as soon as updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave returns, CheckChildrenDone is
calling replicationStartPendingFork that handles that anyway.
The code in updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave had a bug in which it ignored
repl-diskless-sync-delay, but removing that code shows that this bug was
hiding another bug, which is that the max_idle should have used >= and
not >, this one second delay has a big impact on my new test.
this race would only happen when two threads paniced at the same time,
and even then the only consequence is some extra log lines.
race reported in #7391
this race would only happen when two threads paniced at the same time,
and even then the only consequence is some extra log lines.
race reported in #7391
