In order to keep the redismodule.h self-contained but still usable with
gcc v10 and later, annotate each API function tentative definition with
the __common__ attribute. This avoids the 'multiple definition' errors
modules will otherwise see for all API functions at link time.
Further details at gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html
Turn the existing __attribute__ ((unused)), ((__common__)) and ((print))
annotations into conditional macros for any compilers not accepting this
syntax. These macros only expand to API annotations under gcc.
Provide a pre- and post- macro for every API function, so that they can
be defined differently by the file that includes redismodule.h.
Removing REDISMODULE_API_FUNC in the interest of keeping the function
declarations readable.
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
In order to keep the redismodule.h self-contained but still usable with
gcc v10 and later, annotate each API function tentative definition with
the __common__ attribute. This avoids the 'multiple definition' errors
modules will otherwise see for all API functions at link time.
Further details at gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html
Turn the existing __attribute__ ((unused)), ((__common__)) and ((print))
annotations into conditional macros for any compilers not accepting this
syntax. These macros only expand to API annotations under gcc.
Provide a pre- and post- macro for every API function, so that they can
be defined differently by the file that includes redismodule.h.
Removing REDISMODULE_API_FUNC in the interest of keeping the function
declarations readable.
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Client that issued WAIT last will most likely have the highest replication offset, so imagine a probably common case where all clients are waiting for the same number of replicas. we prefer the loop to start from the last client (one waiting for the highest offset), so that the optimization in the function will call replicationCountAcksByOffset for each client until it found a good one, and stop calling it for the rest of the clients.
the way the loop was implemented would mean that in such case it is likely to call replicationCountAcksByOffset for all clients.
Note: the change from > to >= is not directly related to the above.
Co-authored-by: 曹正斌 <caozb@jiedaibao.com>
Client that issued WAIT last will most likely have the highest replication offset, so imagine a probably common case where all clients are waiting for the same number of replicas. we prefer the loop to start from the last client (one waiting for the highest offset), so that the optimization in the function will call replicationCountAcksByOffset for each client until it found a good one, and stop calling it for the rest of the clients.
the way the loop was implemented would mean that in such case it is likely to call replicationCountAcksByOffset for all clients.
Note: the change from > to >= is not directly related to the above.
Co-authored-by: 曹正斌 <caozb@jiedaibao.com>
Add Linux kernel OOM killer control option.
This adds the ability to control the Linux OOM killer oom_score_adj
parameter for all Redis processes, depending on the process role (i.e.
master, replica, background child).
A oom-score-adj global boolean flag control this feature. In addition,
specific values can be configured using oom-score-adj-values if
additional tuning is required.
Add Linux kernel OOM killer control option.
This adds the ability to control the Linux OOM killer oom_score_adj
parameter for all Redis processes, depending on the process role (i.e.
master, replica, background child).
A oom-score-adj global boolean flag control this feature. In addition,
specific values can be configured using oom-score-adj-values if
additional tuning is required.
This is a rebased version of #3078 originally by shaharmor
with the following patches by TysonAndre made after rebasing
to work with the updated C API:
1. Add 2 more unit tests
(wrong argument count error message, integer over 64 bits)
2. Use addReplyArrayLen instead of addReplyMultiBulkLen.
3. Undo changes to src/help.h - for the ZMSCORE PR,
I heard those should instead be automatically
generated from the redis-doc repo if it gets updated
Motivations:
- Example use case: Client code to efficiently check if each element of a set
of 1000 items is a member of a set of 10 million items.
(Similar to reasons for working on #7593)
- HMGET and ZMSCORE already exist. This may lead to developers deciding
to implement functionality that's best suited to a regular set with a
data type of sorted set or hash map instead, for the multi-get support.
Currently, multi commands or lua scripting to call sismember multiple times
would almost definitely be less efficient than a native smismember
for the following reasons:
- Need to fetch the set from the string every time
instead of reusing the C pointer.
- Using pipelining or multi-commands would result in more bytes sent
and received by the client for the repeated SISMEMBER KEY sections.
- Need to specially encode the data and decode it from the client
for lua-based solutions.
- Proposed solutions using Lua or SADD/SDIFF could trigger writes to
memory, which is undesirable on a redis replica server
or when commands get replicated to replicas.
Co-Authored-By: Shahar Mor <shahar@peer5.com>
Co-Authored-By: Tyson Andre <tysonandre775@hotmail.com>
This is a rebased version of #3078 originally by shaharmor
with the following patches by TysonAndre made after rebasing
to work with the updated C API:
1. Add 2 more unit tests
(wrong argument count error message, integer over 64 bits)
2. Use addReplyArrayLen instead of addReplyMultiBulkLen.
3. Undo changes to src/help.h - for the ZMSCORE PR,
I heard those should instead be automatically
generated from the redis-doc repo if it gets updated
Motivations:
- Example use case: Client code to efficiently check if each element of a set
of 1000 items is a member of a set of 10 million items.
(Similar to reasons for working on #7593)
- HMGET and ZMSCORE already exist. This may lead to developers deciding
to implement functionality that's best suited to a regular set with a
data type of sorted set or hash map instead, for the multi-get support.
Currently, multi commands or lua scripting to call sismember multiple times
would almost definitely be less efficient than a native smismember
for the following reasons:
- Need to fetch the set from the string every time
instead of reusing the C pointer.
- Using pipelining or multi-commands would result in more bytes sent
and received by the client for the repeated SISMEMBER KEY sections.
- Need to specially encode the data and decode it from the client
for lua-based solutions.
- Proposed solutions using Lua or SADD/SDIFF could trigger writes to
memory, which is undesirable on a redis replica server
or when commands get replicated to replicas.
Co-Authored-By: Shahar Mor <shahar@peer5.com>
Co-Authored-By: Tyson Andre <tysonandre775@hotmail.com>
