If we enable diskless replication, set repl-diskless-sync-delay to 0,
and master has non-rdb child process such as rewrite aof child, master
will try to start to a new BGSAVE but fails immediately (before fork)
when replicas ask for full synchronization, and master always fails
to start a new BGSAVE and disconnects with replicas until non-rdb
child process exists.
this bug was introduced in #6271 (not yet released in 6.0.x)
This is hopefully usually harmles.
The server.ready_keys will usually be empty so the code after releasing
the GIL will soon be done.
The only case where it'll actually process things is when a module
releases a client (or module) blocked on a key, by triggering this NOT
from within a command (e.g. a timer event).
This bug was introduced in redis 6.0.9, see #7903
This is hopefully usually harmles.
The server.ready_keys will usually be empty so the code after releasing
the GIL will soon be done.
The only case where it'll actually process things is when a module
releases a client (or module) blocked on a key, by triggering this NOT
from within a command (e.g. a timer event).
This bug was introduced in redis 6.0.9, see #7903
Fix: When oom-score-adj-values is provided in the config file after
oom-score-adj yes, it'll take an immediate action, before
readOOMScoreAdj was acquired, resulting in an error (out of range score
due to uninitialized value. delay the reaction the real call is made by
main().
Since the values are clamped to -1000..1000, and they're
applied as an offset from the value at startup (which may be -1000), we
need to allow the offsets to reach to +2000 so that a value of +1000 is
achievable in case the value at startup was -1000.
Adding an option for absolute values rather than relative ones.
Fix: When oom-score-adj-values is provided in the config file after
oom-score-adj yes, it'll take an immediate action, before
readOOMScoreAdj was acquired, resulting in an error (out of range score
due to uninitialized value. delay the reaction the real call is made by
main().
Since the values are clamped to -1000..1000, and they're
applied as an offset from the value at startup (which may be -1000), we
need to allow the offsets to reach to +2000 so that a value of +1000 is
achievable in case the value at startup was -1000.
Adding an option for absolute values rather than relative ones.
The bug was introduced by #5021 which only attempted avoid EXIST on an
already expired key from returning 1 on a replica.
Before that commit, dbExists was used instead of
lookupKeyRead (which had an undesired effect to "touch" the LRU/LFU)
Other than that, this commit fixes OBJECT to also come empty handed on
expired keys in replica.
And DEBUG DIGEST-VALUE to behave like DEBUG OBJECT (get the data from
the key regardless of it's expired state)
The bug was introduced by #5021 which only attempted avoid EXIST on an
already expired key from returning 1 on a replica.
Before that commit, dbExists was used instead of
lookupKeyRead (which had an undesired effect to "touch" the LRU/LFU)
Other than that, this commit fixes OBJECT to also come empty handed on
expired keys in replica.
And DEBUG DIGEST-VALUE to behave like DEBUG OBJECT (get the data from
the key regardless of it's expired state)
Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because,
the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply.
Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands:
LUA - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing
and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their
blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag).
MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside
multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they
return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop
inside MULTI will act as lpop)
For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is
REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened.
Disadvantages of the current state are:
No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment
Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error).
Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not
to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base
on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting
language like javascript or python).
While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or
REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to
check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way
for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution.
This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing
a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag
turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command
verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees
that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results
which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today).
The new flag is checked on the following commands:
List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE,
Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX
Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP
SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR
In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to
block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there
is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it).
To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands
were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept.
To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE).
We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI.
The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR
is not allowed inside MULTI.
Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI,
or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because,
the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply.
Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands:
LUA - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing
and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their
blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag).
MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside
multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they
return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop
inside MULTI will act as lpop)
For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is
REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened.
Disadvantages of the current state are:
No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment
Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error).
Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not
to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base
on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting
language like javascript or python).
While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or
REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to
check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way
for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution.
This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing
a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag
turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command
verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees
that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results
which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today).
The new flag is checked on the following commands:
List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE,
Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX
Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP
SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR
In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to
block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there
is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it).
To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands
were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept.
To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE).
We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI.
The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR
is not allowed inside MULTI.
Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI,
or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
ZREVRANGEBYSCORE key max min [WITHSCORES] [LIMIT offset count]
When the offset is too large, the query is very slow. Especially when the offset is greater than the length of zset it is easy to determine whether the offset is greater than the length of zset at first, and If it exceed the length of zset, then return directly.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
ZREVRANGEBYSCORE key max min [WITHSCORES] [LIMIT offset count]
When the offset is too large, the query is very slow. Especially when the offset is greater than the length of zset it is easy to determine whether the offset is greater than the length of zset at first, and If it exceed the length of zset, then return directly.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
* Configuration file default should now be "auto".
* Expose "process_supervised" as an info field.
* Log messages improvements (clarify required systemd config, report
auto-detected supervision mode, etc.)
* Set server.supervised properly, so it can take precedence of
"daemonize" configuration.
* Produce clear warning if systemd is detected/requested but executable
is compiled without support for it, instead of silently ignoring.
* Handle systemd notification error on startup, and turn off supervised
mode if it failed.
* Configuration file default should now be "auto".
* Expose "process_supervised" as an info field.
* Log messages improvements (clarify required systemd config, report
auto-detected supervision mode, etc.)
* Set server.supervised properly, so it can take precedence of
"daemonize" configuration.
* Produce clear warning if systemd is detected/requested but executable
is compiled without support for it, instead of silently ignoring.
* Handle systemd notification error on startup, and turn off supervised
mode if it failed.
Syntax:
COPY <key> <new-key> [DB <dest-db>] [REPLACE]
No support for module keys yet.
Co-authored-by: tmgauss
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Syntax:
COPY <key> <new-key> [DB <dest-db>] [REPLACE]
No support for module keys yet.
Co-authored-by: tmgauss
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Add two optional callbacks to the RedisModuleTypeMethods structure, which is `free_effort`
and `unlink`. the `free_effort` callback indicates the effort required to free a module memory.
Currently, if the effort exceeds LAZYFREE_THRESHOLD, the module memory may be released
asynchronously. the `unlink` callback indicates the key has been removed from the DB by redis, and
may soon be freed by a background thread.
Add `lazyfreed_objects` info field, which represents the number of objects that have been
lazyfreed since redis was started.
Add `RM_GetTypeMethodVersion` API, which return the current redis-server runtime value of
`REDISMODULE_TYPE_METHOD_VERSION`. You can use that when calling `RM_CreateDataType` to know
which fields of RedisModuleTypeMethods are gonna be supported and which will be ignored.
Add two optional callbacks to the RedisModuleTypeMethods structure, which is `free_effort`
and `unlink`. the `free_effort` callback indicates the effort required to free a module memory.
Currently, if the effort exceeds LAZYFREE_THRESHOLD, the module memory may be released
asynchronously. the `unlink` callback indicates the key has been removed from the DB by redis, and
may soon be freed by a background thread.
Add `lazyfreed_objects` info field, which represents the number of objects that have been
lazyfreed since redis was started.
Add `RM_GetTypeMethodVersion` API, which return the current redis-server runtime value of
`REDISMODULE_TYPE_METHOD_VERSION`. You can use that when calling `RM_CreateDataType` to know
which fields of RedisModuleTypeMethods are gonna be supported and which will be ignored.
- Add ZDIFF and ZDIFFSTORE which work similarly to SDIFF and SDIFFSTORE
- Make sure the new WITHSCORES argument that was added for ZUNION isn't considered valid for ZUNIONSTORE
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
- Add ZDIFF and ZDIFFSTORE which work similarly to SDIFF and SDIFFSTORE
- Make sure the new WITHSCORES argument that was added for ZUNION isn't considered valid for ZUNIONSTORE
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
BLPOP when there are elements in the list works in the same way as LPOP
does. Due to this they also does the same repetitive action and logic
for the same is written at two different places. This is a bad code
practice as the one needs the context to change the BLPOP list pop code
as well when the LPOP code gets changed.
Separated the generic logic from LPOP to a function that is being used
by the BLPOP code as well.
BLPOP when there are elements in the list works in the same way as LPOP
does. Due to this they also does the same repetitive action and logic
for the same is written at two different places. This is a bad code
practice as the one needs the context to change the BLPOP list pop code
as well when the LPOP code gets changed.
Separated the generic logic from LPOP to a function that is being used
by the BLPOP code as well.
