In XREADGROUP ACK, because streamPropagateXCLAIM does not propagate
entries-read, entries-read will be inconsistent between master and
replicas.
I.e. if no entries were claimed, it would have propagated correctly, but
if some
were claimed, then the entries-read field would be inconsistent on the
replica.
The fix was suggested by guybe7, call streamPropagateGroupID
unconditionally,
so that we will normalize entries_read on the replicas. In the past, we
would
only set propagate_last_id when NOACK was specified. And in #9127,
XCLAIM did
not propagate entries_read in ACK, which would cause entries_read to be
inconsistent between master and replicas.
Another approach is add another arg to XCLAIM and let it propagate
entries_read,
but we decided not to use it. Because we want minimal damage in case
there's an
old target and new source (in the worst case scenario, the new source
doesn't
recognize XGROUP SETID ... ENTRIES READ and the lag is lost. If we
change XCLAIM,
the damage is much more severe).
In this patch, now if the user uses XREADGROUP .. COUNT 1 there will be
an additional
overhead of MULTI, EXEC and XGROUPSETID. We assume the extra command in
case of
COUNT 1 (4x factor, changing from one XCLAIM to
MULTI+XCLAIM+XSETID+EXEC), is probably
ok since reading just one entry is in any case very inefficient (a
client round trip
per record), so we're hoping it's not a common case.
Issue was introduced in #9127.
f17381a38d