Before this change (most recently modified in
https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/12850#discussion_r1421406393), The
trigger for normal expand threshold was 100% utilization and the trigger
for normal shrink threshold was 10% (HASHTABLE_MIN_FILL).
While during fork (DICT_RESIZE_AVOID), when we want to avoid rehash, the
trigger thresholds were multiplied by 5 (`dict_force_resize_ratio`),
meaning 500% for expand and 2% (100/10/5) for shrink.
However, in `dictRehash` (the incremental rehashing), the rehashing
threshold for shrinking during fork (DICT_RESIZE_AVOID) was 20% by
mistake.
This meant that if a shrinking is triggered when `dict_can_resize` is
`DICT_RESIZE_ENABLE` which the threshold is 10%, the rehashing can
continue when `dict_can_resize` is `DICT_RESIZE_AVOID`.
This would cause unwanted CopyOnWrite damage.
It'll make sense to change the thresholds of the rehash trigger and the
thresholds of the incremental rehashing the same, however, in one we
compare the size of the hash table to the number of records, and in the
other we compare the size of ht[0] to the size of ht[1], so the formula
is not exactly the same.
to make things easier we change all the thresholds to powers of 2, so
the normal shrinking threshold is changed from 100/10 (i.e. 10%) to
100/8 (i.e. 12.5%), and we change the threshold during forks from 5 to
4, i.e. from 500% to 400% for expand, and from 2% (100/10/5) to 3.125%
(100/8/4)
b07174afc2