In #11666, we added a while loop and will split a big reply
node to multiple nodes. The update of tail->repl_offset may
be wrong. Like before #11666, we would have created at most
one new reply node, and now we will create multiple nodes if
it is a big reply node.
Now we are creating more than one node, and the tail->repl_offset
of all the nodes except the last one are incorrect. Because we
update master_repl_offset at the beginning, and then use it to
update the tail->repl_offset. This would have lead to an assertion
during PSYNC, a test was added to validate that case.
Besides that, the calculation of size was adjusted to fix
tests that failed due to a combination of a very low backlog size,
and some thresholds of that get violated because of the relatively
high overhead of replBufBlock. So now if the backlog size / 16 is too
small, we'll take PROTO_REPLY_CHUNK_BYTES instead.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
7997874f4d