42c8c61813
This PR is to fix the compilation warnings and errors generated by the latest
complier toolchain, and to add a new runner of the latest toolchain for daily CI.
## Fix various compilation warnings and errors
1) jemalloc.c
COMPILER: clang-14 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
WARNING:
```
src/jemalloc.c:1028:7: warning: suspicious concatenation of string literals in an array initialization; did you mean to separate the elements with a comma? [-Wstring-concatenation]
"/etc/malloc.conf",
^
src/jemalloc.c:1027:3: note: place parentheses around the string literal to silence warning
"\"name\" of the file referenced by the symbolic link named "
^
```
REASON: the compiler to alert developers to potential issues with string concatenation
that may miss a comma,
just like #9534 which misses a comma.
SOLUTION: use `()` to tell the compiler that these two line strings are continuous.
2) config.h
COMPILER: clang-14 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
WARNING:
```
In file included from quicklist.c:36:
./config.h:319:76: warning: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Wignored-attributes]
char *strcat(char *restrict dest, const char *restrict src) __attribute__((deprecated("please avoid use of unsafe C functions. prefer use of redis_strlcat instead")));
```
REASON: Enabling _FORTIFY_SOURCE will cause the compiler to use `strcpy()` with check,
it results in a deprecated attribute declaration after including <features.h>.
SOLUTION: move the deprecated attribute declaration from config.h to fmacro.h before "#include <features.h>".
3) networking.c
COMPILER: GCC-12
WARNING:
```
networking.c: In function ‘addReplyDouble.part.0’:
networking.c:876:21: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
876 | dbuf[start] = '$';
| ^
networking.c:868:14: note: at offset -5 into destination object ‘dbuf’ of size 5152
868 | char dbuf[MAX_LONG_DOUBLE_CHARS+32];
| ^
networking.c:876:21: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
876 | dbuf[start] = '$';
| ^
networking.c:868:14: note: at offset -6 into destination object ‘dbuf’ of size 5152
868 | char dbuf[MAX_LONG_DOUBLE_CHARS+32];
```
REASON: GCC-12 predicts that digits10() may return 9 or 10 through `return 9 + (v >= 1000000000UL)`.
SOLUTION: add an assert to let the compiler know the possible length;
4) redis-cli.c & redis-benchmark.c
COMPILER: clang-14 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
WARNING:
```
redis-benchmark.c:1621:2: warning: embedding a directive within macro arguments has undefined behavior [-Wembedded-directive] #ifdef USE_OPENSSL
redis-cli.c:3015:2: warning: embedding a directive within macro arguments has undefined behavior [-Wembedded-directive] #ifdef USE_OPENSSL
```
REASON: when _FORTIFY_SOURCE is enabled, the compiler will use the print() with
check, which is a macro. this may result in the use of directives within the macro, which
is undefined behavior.
SOLUTION: move the directives-related code out of `print()`.
5) server.c
COMPILER: gcc-13 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
WARNING:
```
In function 'lookupCommandLogic',
inlined from 'lookupCommandBySdsLogic' at server.c:3139:32:
server.c:3102:66: error: '*(robj **)argv' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
3102 | struct redisCommand *base_cmd = dictFetchValue(commands, argv[0]->ptr);
| ~~~~^~~
```
REASON: The compiler thinks that the `argc` returned by `sdssplitlen()` could be 0,
resulting in an empty array of size 0 being passed to lookupCommandLogic.
this should be a false positive, `argc` can't be 0 when strings are not NULL.
SOLUTION: add an assert to let the compiler know that `argc` is positive.
6) sha1.c
COMPILER: gcc-12
WARNING:
```
In function ‘SHA1Update’,
inlined from ‘SHA1Final’ at sha1.c:195:5:
sha1.c:152:13: warning: ‘SHA1Transform’ reading 64 bytes from a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overread]
152 | SHA1Transform(context->state, &data[i]);
| ^
sha1.c:152:13: note: referencing argument 2 of type ‘const unsigned char[64]’
sha1.c: In function ‘SHA1Final’:
sha1.c:56:6: note: in a call to function ‘SHA1Transform’
56 | void SHA1Transform(uint32_t state[5], const unsigned char buffer[64])
| ^
In function ‘SHA1Update’,
inlined from ‘SHA1Final’ at sha1.c:198:9:
sha1.c:152:13: warning: ‘SHA1Transform’ reading 64 bytes from a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overread]
152 | SHA1Transform(context->state, &data[i]);
| ^
sha1.c:152:13: note: referencing argument 2 of type ‘const unsigned char[64]’
sha1.c: In function ‘SHA1Final’:
sha1.c:56:6: note: in a call to function ‘SHA1Transform’
56 | void SHA1Transform(uint32_t state[5], const unsigned char buffer[64])
```
REASON: due to the bug[https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80922], when
enable LTO, gcc-12 will not see `diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overread"`, resulting in a warning.
SOLUTION: temporarily set SHA1Update to noinline to avoid compiler warnings due
to LTO being enabled until the above gcc bug is fixed.
7) zmalloc.h
COMPILER: GCC-12
WARNING:
```
In function ‘memset’,
inlined from ‘moduleCreateContext’ at module.c:877:5,
inlined from ‘RM_GetDetachedThreadSafeContext’ at module.c:8410:5:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:59:10: warning: ‘__builtin_memset’ writing 104 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=]
59 | return __builtin___memset_chk (__dest, __ch, __len,
```
REASON: due to the GCC-12 bug [https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503],
GCC-12 cannot see alloc_size, which causes GCC to think that the actual size of memory
is 0 when checking with __glibc_objsize0().
SOLUTION: temporarily set malloc-related interfaces to `noinline` to avoid compiler warnings
due to LTO being enabled until the above gcc bug is fixed.
## Other changes
1) Fixed `ps -p [pid]` doesn't output `<defunct>` when using procps 4.x causing `replication
child dies when parent is killed - diskless` test to fail.
2) Add a new fortify CI with GCC-13 and ubuntu-lunar docker image.
jemalloc is a general purpose malloc(3) implementation that emphasizes fragmentation avoidance and scalable concurrency support. jemalloc first came into use as the FreeBSD libc allocator in 2005, and since then it has found its way into numerous applications that rely on its predictable behavior. In 2010 jemalloc development efforts broadened to include developer support features such as heap profiling and extensive monitoring/tuning hooks. Modern jemalloc releases continue to be integrated back into FreeBSD, and therefore versatility remains critical. Ongoing development efforts trend toward making jemalloc among the best allocators for a broad range of demanding applications, and eliminating/mitigating weaknesses that have practical repercussions for real world applications. The COPYING file contains copyright and licensing information. The INSTALL file contains information on how to configure, build, and install jemalloc. The ChangeLog file contains a brief summary of changes for each release. URL: http://jemalloc.net/