On Darwin /dev/urandom depletes terribly fast. This is not an issue
normally, but with Redis Cluster we generate a lot of unique IDs, for
example during nodes handshakes. Our IDs need just to be unique without
other strong crypto requirements, so this commit turns the function into
something that gets a 20 bytes seed from /dev/urandom, and produces the
rest of the output just using SHA1 in counter mode.
On Darwin /dev/urandom depletes terribly fast. This is not an issue
normally, but with Redis Cluster we generate a lot of unique IDs, for
example during nodes handshakes. Our IDs need just to be unique without
other strong crypto requirements, so this commit turns the function into
something that gets a 20 bytes seed from /dev/urandom, and produces the
rest of the output just using SHA1 in counter mode.
Fixes valgrind error:
48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 196 of 373
at 0x4910D3: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x42807D: zmalloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x41FA0D: dictGetIterator (dict.c:543)
by 0x41FA48: dictGetSafeIterator (dict.c:555)
by 0x459B73: clusterHandleSlaveMigration (cluster.c:2776)
by 0x45BF27: clusterCron (cluster.c:3123)
by 0x423344: serverCron (redis.c:1239)
by 0x41D6CD: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:311)
by 0x41D8EA: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x41A84B: main (redis.c:3832)
Fixes valgrind error:
48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 196 of 373
at 0x4910D3: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x42807D: zmalloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x41FA0D: dictGetIterator (dict.c:543)
by 0x41FA48: dictGetSafeIterator (dict.c:555)
by 0x459B73: clusterHandleSlaveMigration (cluster.c:2776)
by 0x45BF27: clusterCron (cluster.c:3123)
by 0x423344: serverCron (redis.c:1239)
by 0x41D6CD: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:311)
by 0x41D8EA: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x41A84B: main (redis.c:3832)
If array has N elements, we can't read +1 if we are already at N.
Also, we need to move elements by their storage size in the array,
not just by individual bytes.
If array has N elements, we can't read +1 if we are already at N.
Also, we need to move elements by their storage size in the array,
not just by individual bytes.
[maybe] Fixes valgrind errors:
32 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 107 of 228
at 0x80EA447: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x806E59C: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x80A9AFC: clusterSetMaster (cluster.c:801)
by 0x80AEDC9: clusterCommand (cluster.c:3994)
by 0x80682A5: call (redis.c:2049)
by 0x8068A20: processCommand (redis.c:2309)
by 0x8076497: processInputBuffer (networking.c:1143)
by 0x8073BAF: readQueryFromClient (networking.c:1208)
by 0x8060E98: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:412)
by 0x806123B: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x806C3DB: main (redis.c:3832)
64 bytes in 8 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 143 of 228
at 0x80EA447: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x806E59C: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x80AAB40: clusterProcessPacket (cluster.c:801)
by 0x80A847F: clusterReadHandler (cluster.c:1975)
by 0x30000FF: ???
80 bytes in 10 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 148 of 228
at 0x80EA447: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x806E59C: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x80AAB40: clusterProcessPacket (cluster.c:801)
by 0x80A847F: clusterReadHandler (cluster.c:1975)
by 0x2FFFFFF: ???
[maybe] Fixes valgrind errors:
32 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 107 of 228
at 0x80EA447: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x806E59C: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x80A9AFC: clusterSetMaster (cluster.c:801)
by 0x80AEDC9: clusterCommand (cluster.c:3994)
by 0x80682A5: call (redis.c:2049)
by 0x8068A20: processCommand (redis.c:2309)
by 0x8076497: processInputBuffer (networking.c:1143)
by 0x8073BAF: readQueryFromClient (networking.c:1208)
by 0x8060E98: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:412)
by 0x806123B: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x806C3DB: main (redis.c:3832)
64 bytes in 8 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 143 of 228
at 0x80EA447: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x806E59C: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x80AAB40: clusterProcessPacket (cluster.c:801)
by 0x80A847F: clusterReadHandler (cluster.c:1975)
by 0x30000FF: ???
80 bytes in 10 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 148 of 228
at 0x80EA447: je_malloc (jemalloc.c:944)
by 0x806E59C: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:125)
by 0x80AAB40: clusterProcessPacket (cluster.c:801)
by 0x80A847F: clusterReadHandler (cluster.c:1975)
by 0x2FFFFFF: ???
Fixes valgrind error:
Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
at 0x514C35D: ??? (syscall-template.S:81)
by 0x456B81: clusterWriteHandler (cluster.c:1907)
by 0x41D596: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:416)
by 0x41D8EA: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x41A84B: main (redis.c:3832)
Address 0x5f268e2 is 2,274 bytes inside a block of size 8,192 alloc'd
at 0x4932D1: je_realloc (jemalloc.c:1297)
by 0x428185: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:162)
by 0x4269E0: sdsMakeRoomFor.part.0 (sds.c:142)
by 0x426CD7: sdscatlen (sds.c:251)
by 0x4579E7: clusterSendMessage (cluster.c:1995)
by 0x45805A: clusterSendPing (cluster.c:2140)
by 0x45BB03: clusterCron (cluster.c:2944)
by 0x423344: serverCron (redis.c:1239)
by 0x41D6CD: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:311)
by 0x41D8EA: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x41A84B: main (redis.c:3832)
Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
at 0x457810: nodeUpdateAddressIfNeeded (cluster.c:1236)
Fixes valgrind error:
Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
at 0x514C35D: ??? (syscall-template.S:81)
by 0x456B81: clusterWriteHandler (cluster.c:1907)
by 0x41D596: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:416)
by 0x41D8EA: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x41A84B: main (redis.c:3832)
Address 0x5f268e2 is 2,274 bytes inside a block of size 8,192 alloc'd
at 0x4932D1: je_realloc (jemalloc.c:1297)
by 0x428185: zrealloc (zmalloc.c:162)
by 0x4269E0: sdsMakeRoomFor.part.0 (sds.c:142)
by 0x426CD7: sdscatlen (sds.c:251)
by 0x4579E7: clusterSendMessage (cluster.c:1995)
by 0x45805A: clusterSendPing (cluster.c:2140)
by 0x45BB03: clusterCron (cluster.c:2944)
by 0x423344: serverCron (redis.c:1239)
by 0x41D6CD: aeProcessEvents (ae.c:311)
by 0x41D8EA: aeMain (ae.c:455)
by 0x41A84B: main (redis.c:3832)
Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
at 0x457810: nodeUpdateAddressIfNeeded (cluster.c:1236)
The cleanup code expects that if 'di' is not NULL, it is a valid
iterator that should be freed.
The result of this bug was a crash of the AOF rewriting process if an
error occurred after the DBs data are written and the iterator is no
longer valid.
The cleanup code expects that if 'di' is not NULL, it is a valid
iterator that should be freed.
The result of this bug was a crash of the AOF rewriting process if an
error occurred after the DBs data are written and the iterator is no
longer valid.
Rationale is that when re-entering, it is likely due to Lua debugging
hooks. Returning an error will be ignored in most cases, going totally
unnoticed. With the log at least we leave a trace.
Related to issue #2302.
Rationale is that when re-entering, it is likely due to Lua debugging
hooks. Returning an error will be ignored in most cases, going totally
unnoticed. With the log at least we leave a trace.
Related to issue #2302.
