1. Call emptyDb even in case of diskless-load: We want modules
to get the same FLUSHDB event as disk-based replication.
2. Do not fire any module events when flushing the backups array.
3. Delete redundant call to signalFlushedDb (Called from emptyDb).
1. Call emptyDb even in case of diskless-load: We want modules
to get the same FLUSHDB event as disk-based replication.
2. Do not fire any module events when flushing the backups array.
3. Delete redundant call to signalFlushedDb (Called from emptyDb).
Because "keymiss" is "special" compared to the rest of
the notifications (Trying not to break existing apps
using the 'A' format for notifications)
Also updated redis.conf and module.c docs
Because "keymiss" is "special" compared to the rest of
the notifications (Trying not to break existing apps
using the 'A' format for notifications)
Also updated redis.conf and module.c docs
SELECT, and HELLO are commands that may be executed by the client
as soon as it connects, there's no reason to block them, preventing the
client from doing the rest of his sequence (which might just be INFO or
CONFIG, etc).
MONITOR, DEBUG, SLOWLOG, TIME, LASTSAVE are all non-data accessing
commands, which there's no reason to block.
SELECT, and HELLO are commands that may be executed by the client
as soon as it connects, there's no reason to block them, preventing the
client from doing the rest of his sequence (which might just be INFO or
CONFIG, etc).
MONITOR, DEBUG, SLOWLOG, TIME, LASTSAVE are all non-data accessing
commands, which there's no reason to block.
the warning condition was if usage > limit (saying it'll cause eviction
or oom), but in fact the eviction and oom depends on used minus slave
buffers.
other than fixing the condition, i add info about the current usage and
limit, which may be useful when looking at the log.
the warning condition was if usage > limit (saying it'll cause eviction
or oom), but in fact the eviction and oom depends on used minus slave
buffers.
other than fixing the condition, i add info about the current usage and
limit, which may be useful when looking at the log.
althouh in theory, users can do BGREWRITEAOF even if aof is disabled, i
suppose it is more common that the scheduled flag is set by either
startAppendOnly, of a failed initial AOFRW fork (AOF_WAIT_REWRITE)
althouh in theory, users can do BGREWRITEAOF even if aof is disabled, i
suppose it is more common that the scheduled flag is set by either
startAppendOnly, of a failed initial AOFRW fork (AOF_WAIT_REWRITE)
