i.e. don't start the search from scratch hitting the used ones again.
this will also reduce the likelihood of collisions (if there are any
left) by increasing the time until we re-use a port we did use in the
past.
apparently when running tests in parallel (the default of --clients 16),
there's a chance for two tests to use the same port.
specifically, one test might shutdown a master and still have the
replica up, and then another test will re-use the port number of master
for another master, and then that replica will connect to the master of
the other test.
this can cause a master to count too many full syncs and fail a test if
we run the tests with --single integration/psync2 --loop --stop
see Probmem 2 in #7314
these tests create several edge cases that are otherwise uncovered (at
least not consistently) by the test suite, so although they're no longer
testing what they were meant to test, it's still a good idea to keep
them in hope that they'll expose some issue in the future.
these tests create several edge cases that are otherwise uncovered (at
least not consistently) by the test suite, so although they're no longer
testing what they were meant to test, it's still a good idea to keep
them in hope that they'll expose some issue in the future.
i.e. don't start the search from scratch hitting the used ones again.
this will also reduce the likelihood of collisions (if there are any
left) by increasing the time until we re-use a port we did use in the
past.
apparently when running tests in parallel (the default of --clients 16),
there's a chance for two tests to use the same port.
specifically, one test might shutdown a master and still have the
replica up, and then another test will re-use the port number of master
for another master, and then that replica will connect to the master of
the other test.
this can cause a master to count too many full syncs and fail a test if
we run the tests with --single integration/psync2 --loop --stop
see Probmem 2 in #7314
There's a rare case which leads to stagnation in the defragger, causing
it to keep scanning the keyspace and do nothing (not moving any
allocation), this happens when all the allocator slabs of a certain bin
have the same % utilization, but the slab from which new allocations are
made have a lower utilization.
this commit fixes it by removing the current slab from the overall
average utilization of the bin, and also eliminate any precision loss in
the utilization calculation and move the decision about the defrag to
reside inside jemalloc.
and also add a test that consistently reproduce this issue.
