Adding a new type mask for key space notification, REDISMODULE_NOTIFY_MODULE, to enable unique notifications from commands on REDISMODULE_KEYTYPE_MODULE type keys (which is currently unsupported).
Modules can subscribe to a module key keyspace notification by RM_SubscribeToKeyspaceEvents,
and clients by notify-keyspace-events of redis.conf or via the CONFIG SET, with the characters 'd' or 'A'
(REDISMODULE_NOTIFY_MODULE type mask is part of the '**A**ll' notation for key space notifications).
Refactor: move some pubsub test infra from pubsub.tcl to util.tcl to be re-used by other tests.
Adding a new type mask for key space notification, REDISMODULE_NOTIFY_MODULE, to enable unique notifications from commands on REDISMODULE_KEYTYPE_MODULE type keys (which is currently unsupported).
Modules can subscribe to a module key keyspace notification by RM_SubscribeToKeyspaceEvents,
and clients by notify-keyspace-events of redis.conf or via the CONFIG SET, with the characters 'd' or 'A'
(REDISMODULE_NOTIFY_MODULE type mask is part of the '**A**ll' notation for key space notifications).
Refactor: move some pubsub test infra from pubsub.tcl to util.tcl to be re-used by other tests.
Before this commit using RM_Call without "!" could cause the master
to lazy-expire a key (delete it) but without replicating to replicas.
This could cause the replica's memory usage to gradually grow and
could also cause consistency issues if the master and replica have
a clock diff.
This bug was introduced in #8617
Added a test which demonstrates that scenario.
Before this commit using RM_Call without "!" could cause the master
to lazy-expire a key (delete it) but without replicating to replicas.
This could cause the replica's memory usage to gradually grow and
could also cause consistency issues if the master and replica have
a clock diff.
This bug was introduced in #8617
Added a test which demonstrates that scenario.
In the initial release of Redis 6.2 setting a user to only allow pubsub access to
a specific channel, and doing ACL SAVE, resulted in an assertion when
ACL LOAD was used. This was later changed by #8723 (not yet released),
but still not properly resolved (now it errors instead of crash).
The problem is that the server that generates an ACL file, doesn't know what
would be the setting of the acl-pubsub-default config in the server that will load it.
so ACL SAVE needs to always start with resetchannels directive.
This should still be compatible with old acl files (from redis 6.0), and ones from earlier
versions of 6.2 that didn't mess with channels.
Co-authored-by: Harkrishn Patro <harkrisp@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
In the initial release of Redis 6.2 setting a user to only allow pubsub access to
a specific channel, and doing ACL SAVE, resulted in an assertion when
ACL LOAD was used. This was later changed by #8723 (not yet released),
but still not properly resolved (now it errors instead of crash).
The problem is that the server that generates an ACL file, doesn't know what
would be the setting of the acl-pubsub-default config in the server that will load it.
so ACL SAVE needs to always start with resetchannels directive.
This should still be compatible with old acl files (from redis 6.0), and ones from earlier
versions of 6.2 that didn't mess with channels.
Co-authored-by: Harkrishn Patro <harkrisp@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
The tail size of c->reply is 16kb, but in the test only publish a
few chars each time, due to a change in #8699, the obuf limit
is now checked a new memory allocation is made, so this test
would have sometimes failed to trigger a soft limit disconnection
in time.
The solution is to write bigger payloads to the output buffer, but
still limit their rate (not more than 100k/s).
The tail size of c->reply is 16kb, but in the test only publish a
few chars each time, due to a change in #8699, the obuf limit
is now checked a new memory allocation is made, so this test
would have sometimes failed to trigger a soft limit disconnection
in time.
The solution is to write bigger payloads to the output buffer, but
still limit their rate (not more than 100k/s).
When replica never successfully connect to master, server.repl_down_since
will be initialized to 0, therefore, the info master_link_down_since_seconds
was showing the current unix timestamp, which does not make much sense.
This commit fixes the issue by showing master_link_down_since_seconds to -1.
means the replica never connect to master before.
This commit also resets this variable back to 0 when a replica is turned into
a master, so that it'll behave the same if the master is later turned into a
replica again.
The implication of this change is that if some app is checking if the value is > 60
do something, like conclude the replica is stale, this could case harm (changing
a big positive number with a small one).
When replica never successfully connect to master, server.repl_down_since
will be initialized to 0, therefore, the info master_link_down_since_seconds
was showing the current unix timestamp, which does not make much sense.
This commit fixes the issue by showing master_link_down_since_seconds to -1.
means the replica never connect to master before.
This commit also resets this variable back to 0 when a replica is turned into
a master, so that it'll behave the same if the master is later turned into a
replica again.
The implication of this change is that if some app is checking if the value is > 60
do something, like conclude the replica is stale, this could case harm (changing
a big positive number with a small one).
