i.e. don't start the search from scratch hitting the used ones again.
this will also reduce the likelihood of collisions (if there are any
left) by increasing the time until we re-use a port we did use in the
past.
i.e. don't start the search from scratch hitting the used ones again.
this will also reduce the likelihood of collisions (if there are any
left) by increasing the time until we re-use a port we did use in the
past.
apparently when running tests in parallel (the default of --clients 16),
there's a chance for two tests to use the same port.
specifically, one test might shutdown a master and still have the
replica up, and then another test will re-use the port number of master
for another master, and then that replica will connect to the master of
the other test.
this can cause a master to count too many full syncs and fail a test if
we run the tests with --single integration/psync2 --loop --stop
see Probmem 2 in #7314
apparently when running tests in parallel (the default of --clients 16),
there's a chance for two tests to use the same port.
specifically, one test might shutdown a master and still have the
replica up, and then another test will re-use the port number of master
for another master, and then that replica will connect to the master of
the other test.
this can cause a master to count too many full syncs and fail a test if
we run the tests with --single integration/psync2 --loop --stop
see Probmem 2 in #7314
these tests create several edge cases that are otherwise uncovered (at
least not consistently) by the test suite, so although they're no longer
testing what they were meant to test, it's still a good idea to keep
them in hope that they'll expose some issue in the future.
these tests create several edge cases that are otherwise uncovered (at
least not consistently) by the test suite, so although they're no longer
testing what they were meant to test, it's still a good idea to keep
them in hope that they'll expose some issue in the future.
After a closer look, the Redis core devleopers all believe that this was
too fragile, caused many bugs that we didn't expect and that were very
hard to track. Better to find an alternative solution that is simpler.
After a closer look, the Redis core devleopers all believe that this was
too fragile, caused many bugs that we didn't expect and that were very
hard to track. Better to find an alternative solution that is simpler.
We want to react a bit more aggressively if we sense that the master is
sending us some corrupted stream. By setting the protocol error we both
ensure that the replica will disconnect, and avoid caching the master so
that a full SYNC will be required. This is protective against
replication bugs.
We want to react a bit more aggressively if we sense that the master is
sending us some corrupted stream. By setting the protocol error we both
ensure that the replica will disconnect, and avoid caching the master so
that a full SYNC will be required. This is protective against
replication bugs.
these tests create several edge cases that are otherwise uncovered (at
least not consistently) by the test suite, so although they're no longer
testing what they were meant to test, it's still a good idea to keep
them in hope that they'll expose some issue in the future.
these tests create several edge cases that are otherwise uncovered (at
least not consistently) by the test suite, so although they're no longer
testing what they were meant to test, it's still a good idea to keep
them in hope that they'll expose some issue in the future.
