RESTORE now supports:
1. Setting LRU/LFU
2. Absolute-time TTL
Other related changes:
1. RDB loading will not override LRU bits when RDB file
does not contain the LRU opcode.
2. RDB loading will not set LRU/LFU bits if the server's
maxmemory-policy does not match.
RESTORE now supports:
1. Setting LRU/LFU
2. Absolute-time TTL
Other related changes:
1. RDB loading will not override LRU bits when RDB file
does not contain the LRU opcode.
2. RDB loading will not set LRU/LFU bits if the server's
maxmemory-policy does not match.
this reduces the extra 8 bytes we save before each pointer.
but more importantly maybe, it makes the valgrind runs to be more similiar
to our normal runs.
note: the change in malloc_stats struct in server.h is to eliminate an name conflict.
structs that are not typedefed are resolved from a separate name space.
this reduces the extra 8 bytes we save before each pointer.
but more importantly maybe, it makes the valgrind runs to be more similiar
to our normal runs.
note: the change in malloc_stats struct in server.h is to eliminate an name conflict.
structs that are not typedefed are resolved from a separate name space.
Usually blocking operations make a lot of sense with multiple keys so
that we can listen to multiple queues (or whatever the app models) with
a single connection. However in the synchronous case it is more useful
to be able to ask for N elements. This is a change that I also wanted to
perform soon or later in the blocking list variant, but here it is more
natural since there is no reply type difference.
Usually blocking operations make a lot of sense with multiple keys so
that we can listen to multiple queues (or whatever the app models) with
a single connection. However in the synchronous case it is more useful
to be able to ask for N elements. This is a change that I also wanted to
perform soon or later in the blocking list variant, but here it is more
natural since there is no reply type difference.
Implementation notes: as INFO is "already broken", I didn't want to break it further. Instead of computing the server.lua_script dict size on every call, I'm keeping a running sum of the body's length and dict overheads.
This implementation is naive as it **does not** take into consideration dict rehashing, but that inaccuracy pays off in speed ;)
Demo time:
```bash
$ redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
used_memory_scripts:96
used_memory_scripts_human:96B
number_of_cached_scripts:0
$ redis-cli eval "" 0 ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
(nil)
used_memory_scripts:120
used_memory_scripts_human:120B
number_of_cached_scripts:1
$ redis-cli script flush ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
OK
used_memory_scripts:96
used_memory_scripts_human:96B
number_of_cached_scripts:0
$ redis-cli eval "return('Hello, Script Cache :)')" 0 ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
"Hello, Script Cache :)"
used_memory_scripts:152
used_memory_scripts_human:152B
number_of_cached_scripts:1
$ redis-cli eval "return redis.sha1hex(\"return('Hello, Script Cache :)')\")" 0 ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
"1be72729d43da5114929c1260a749073732dc822"
used_memory_scripts:232
used_memory_scripts_human:232B
number_of_cached_scripts:2
✔ 19:03:54 redis [lua_scripts-in-info-memory L ✚…⚑] $ redis-cli evalsha 1be72729d43da5114929c1260a749073732dc822 0
"Hello, Script Cache :)"
```
Implementation notes: as INFO is "already broken", I didn't want to break it further. Instead of computing the server.lua_script dict size on every call, I'm keeping a running sum of the body's length and dict overheads.
This implementation is naive as it **does not** take into consideration dict rehashing, but that inaccuracy pays off in speed ;)
Demo time:
```bash
$ redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
used_memory_scripts:96
used_memory_scripts_human:96B
number_of_cached_scripts:0
$ redis-cli eval "" 0 ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
(nil)
used_memory_scripts:120
used_memory_scripts_human:120B
number_of_cached_scripts:1
$ redis-cli script flush ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
OK
used_memory_scripts:96
used_memory_scripts_human:96B
number_of_cached_scripts:0
$ redis-cli eval "return('Hello, Script Cache :)')" 0 ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
"Hello, Script Cache :)"
used_memory_scripts:152
used_memory_scripts_human:152B
number_of_cached_scripts:1
$ redis-cli eval "return redis.sha1hex(\"return('Hello, Script Cache :)')\")" 0 ; redis-cli info memory | grep "script"
"1be72729d43da5114929c1260a749073732dc822"
used_memory_scripts:232
used_memory_scripts_human:232B
number_of_cached_scripts:2
✔ 19:03:54 redis [lua_scripts-in-info-memory L ✚…⚑] $ redis-cli evalsha 1be72729d43da5114929c1260a749073732dc822 0
"Hello, Script Cache :)"
```
There are too many advantages in doing this, RDB is faster to persist,
more compact, much faster to load back. The main issues here are that
the code is less tested because this was not the old default (so we are
enabling it for the new 5.0 release), and that the AOF is no longer a
trivially parsable format from now on. However the non-preamble mode
will be supported in the future as well, if new data types will be
added.
