This works because this struct is never referenced by its name,
but always by its type.
This prevents a conflict with struct user from <sys/user.h>
when compiling against uclibc.
Signed-off-by: Titouan Christophe <titouan.christophe@railnova.eu>
Currently, there are several types of threads/child processes of a
redis server. Sometimes we need deeply optimise the performance of
redis, so we would like to isolate threads/processes.
There were some discussion about cpu affinity cases in the issue:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/2863
So implement cpu affinity setting by redis.conf in this patch, then
we can config server_cpulist/bio_cpulist/aof_rewrite_cpulist/
bgsave_cpulist by cpu list.
Examples of cpulist in redis.conf:
server_cpulist 0-7:2 means cpu affinity 0,2,4,6
bio_cpulist 1,3 means cpu affinity 1,3
aof_rewrite_cpulist 8-11 means cpu affinity 8,9,10,11
bgsave_cpulist 1,10-11 means cpu affinity 1,10,11
Test on linux/freebsd, both work fine.
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
When deffered reply is added the previous reply node cannot be used so
all the extra space we allocated in it is wasted. in case someone uses
deffered replies in a loop, each time adding a small reply, each of
these reply nodes (the small string reply) would have consumed a 16k
block.
now when we add anther diferred reply node, we trim the unused portion
of the previous reply block.
see #7123
cherry picked from commit 4ed5b7cb74caf5bef6606909603e371af0da4f9b
with fix to handle a crash with LIBC allocator, which apparently can
return the same pointer despite changing it's size.
i.e. shrinking an allocation of 16k into 56 bytes without changing the
pointer.
* fix memlry leaks with diskless replica short read.
* fix a few timing issues with valgrind runs
* fix issue with valgrind and watchdog schedule signal
about the valgrind WD issue:
the stack trace test in logging.tcl, has issues with valgrind:
==28808== Can't extend stack to 0x1ffeffdb38 during signal delivery for thread 1:
==28808== too small or bad protection modes
it seems to be some valgrind bug with SA_ONSTACK.
SA_ONSTACK seems unneeded since WD is not recursive (SA_NODEFER was removed),
also, not sure if it's even valid without a call to sigaltstack()
We could use uint64_t specific macros, but after all it's simpler to
just use an obvious equivalent type plus casting: this will be a no op
and is simpler than fixed size types printf macros.
1. add eviction-lazyfree monitor
2. put eviction-del & eviction-lazyfree into eviction-cycle
that means eviction-cycle contains all the latency in
the eviction cycle including del and lazyfree
3. use getMaxmemoryState to check if we can break in lazyfree-evict
If client gets blocked again in `processUnblockedClients`, redis will not send
`REPLCONF GETACK *` to slaves untill next eventloop, so the client will be
blocked for 100ms by default(10hz) if no other file event fired.
move server.get_ack_from_slaves sinppet after `processUnblockedClients`, so
that both the first WAIT command that puts client in blocked context and the
following WAIT command processed in processUnblockedClients would trigger
redis-sever to send `REPLCONF GETACK *`, so that the eventloop would get
`REPLCONG ACK <reploffset>` from slaves and unblocked ASAP.
Allows for setting the binaries path if used outside the upstream repo.
Also documents `call` in usage clause (TODO: port to
`redis-cli --cluster call` or just deprecate it).
come to think of it, in theory (not in practice), getDecodedObject can
return the same original object with refcount incremented, so the
pointer comparision in the previous commit was invalid.
so now instead of checking the encoding, we explicitly check the
refcount.
since the recent addition of OBJ_STATIC_REFCOUNT and the assertion in
incrRefCount it is now impossible to use dictFind using a static robj,
because dictEncObjKeyCompare will call getDecodedObject which tries to
increment the refcount just in order to decrement it later.
When deffered reply is added the previous reply node cannot be used so
all the extra space we allocated in it is wasted. in case someone uses
deffered replies in a loop, each time adding a small reply, each of
these reply nodes (the small string reply) would have consumed a 16k
block.
now when we add anther diferred reply node, we trim the unused portion
of the previous reply block.
see #7123
