This commit solves the following bug:
127.0.0.1:6379> XGROUP CREATE x grp $ MKSTREAM
OK
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 666 f v
"666-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) 1) 1) "666-0"
2) 1) "f"
2) "v"
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 667 f v
"667-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XDEL x 667
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) (empty array)
The root cause is that we use s->last_id in streamCompareID
while we should use the last *valid* ID
This commit solves several edge cases that are related to
exhausting the streamID limits: We should correctly calculate
the succeeding streamID instead of blindly incrementing 'seq'
This affects both XREAD and XADD.
Other (unrelated) changes:
Reply with a better error message when trying to add an entry
to a stream that has exhausted last_id
Calling XADD with 0-0 or 0 would result in creating an
empty key and storing it in the database.
Even worse, because XADD will reply with error the action
will not be replicated, creating a master-replica
inconsistency
Fixes GitHub issue #6492
Added stream support in RM_KeyType and RM_ValueLength.
Also moduleDelKeyIfEmpty was updated, even though it has
no effect now (It will be relevant when stream type direct
API will be coded - i.e. RM_StreamAdd)
rename RM_ServerInfoGetFieldNumerical RM_ServerInfoGetFieldSigned
move string2ull to util.c
fix leak in RM_GetServerInfo when duplicate info fields exist
The XCLAIM docs state the XCLAIM increments the delivery counter for
messages. This PR makes the code match the documentation - which seems
like the desired behaviour - whilst still allowing RETRYCOUNT to be
specified manually.
My understanding of the way streamPropagateXCLAIM() works is that this
change will safely propagate to replicas since retry count is pulled
directly from the streamNACK struct.
Fixes#5194
This commit fixes#5570. It is a similar bug to one fixed a few weeks
ago and is due to the range API to be called with NULL as "end ID"
parameter instead of repeating again the start ID, to be sure that we
selectively issue the entry with a given ID, or we get zero returned
(and we know we should emit a NULL reply).
This fixes the issue reported in #5570.
This was fixed the hard way, that is, propagating more information to
the lower level API about this being a request to read just the history,
so that the code is simpler and less likely to regress.
This bug had a double effect:
1. Sometimes entries may not be emitted, producing broken protocol where
the array length was greater than the emitted entires, blocking the
client waiting for more data.
2. Some other time the right entry was claimed, but a wrong entry was
returned to the client.
This fix should correct both the instances.
They play better with Lua scripting, otherwise Lua will see status
replies as "ok" = "string" which is very odd, and actually as @oranagra
reasoned in issue #5456 in the rest of the Redis code base there was no
such concern as saving a few bytes when the protocol is emitted.
