The function returns an unique identifier for the client, as ip:port for
IPv4 and IPv6 clients, or as path:0 for Unix socket clients.
See the top comment in the function for more info.
The function returns an unique identifier for the client, as ip:port for
IPv4 and IPv6 clients, or as path:0 for Unix socket clients.
See the top comment in the function for more info.
IPv6 support is not going to use IPv6 specific options, just it will be
possible to specify all the ipv4 / ipv6 addresses of the interfaces to
bind, otherwise connections will be accepted from all the interfaces in
both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
This reverts commit e2517f47cdb069df67b6ac2a6a295c717c202305.
IPv6 support is not going to use IPv6 specific options, just it will be
possible to specify all the ipv4 / ipv6 addresses of the interfaces to
bind, otherwise connections will be accepted from all the interfaces in
both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
This reverts commit 93570e179e96dc096b85aa0fcd5021b05208594a.
This has been done by exposing the anetSockName() function anet.c
to be used when the sentinel is publishing its existence to the masters.
This implementation is very unintelligent as it will likely break if used
with IPv6 as the nested colons will break any parsing of the PUBLISH string
by the master.
This has been done by exposing the anetSockName() function anet.c
to be used when the sentinel is publishing its existence to the masters.
This implementation is very unintelligent as it will likely break if used
with IPv6 as the nested colons will break any parsing of the PUBLISH string
by the master.
Any places which I feel might want to be updated to work differently
with IPv6 have been marked with a comment starting "IPV6:".
Currently the only comments address places where an IP address is
combined with a port using the standard : separated form. These may want
to be changed when printing IPv6 addresses to wrap the address in []
such as
[2001:db8::c0:ffee]:6379
instead of
2001:db8::c0:ffee:6379
as the latter format is a technically valid IPv6 address and it is hard
to distinguish the IPv6 address component from the port unless you know
the port is supposed to be there.
Any places which I feel might want to be updated to work differently
with IPv6 have been marked with a comment starting "IPV6:".
Currently the only comments address places where an IP address is
combined with a port using the standard : separated form. These may want
to be changed when printing IPv6 addresses to wrap the address in []
such as
[2001:db8::c0:ffee]:6379
instead of
2001:db8::c0:ffee:6379
as the latter format is a technically valid IPv6 address and it is hard
to distinguish the IPv6 address component from the port unless you know
the port is supposed to be there.
In two places buffers have been created with a size of 128 bytes which
could be reduced to INET6_ADDRSTRLEN to still hold a full IP address.
These places have been marked as they are presently big enough to handle
the needs of storing a printable IPv6 address.
In two places buffers have been created with a size of 128 bytes which
could be reduced to INET6_ADDRSTRLEN to still hold a full IP address.
These places have been marked as they are presently big enough to handle
the needs of storing a printable IPv6 address.
