If we can't reconfigure a slave in time during failover, go forward as
anyway the slave will be fixed by Sentinels in the future, once they
detect it is misconfigured.
Otherwise a failover in progress may never terminate if for some reason
the slave is uncapable to sync with the master while at the same time
it is not disconnected.
If we can't reconfigure a slave in time during failover, go forward as
anyway the slave will be fixed by Sentinels in the future, once they
detect it is misconfigured.
Otherwise a failover in progress may never terminate if for some reason
the slave is uncapable to sync with the master while at the same time
it is not disconnected.
Some inline test moved into server_is_up procedure.
Also find_available_port was moved into util since it is going
to be used for the Sentinel test as well.
Some inline test moved into server_is_up procedure.
Also find_available_port was moved into util since it is going
to be used for the Sentinel test as well.
The code tried to obtain the configuration file absolute path after
processing the configuration file. However if config file was a relative
path and a "dir" statement was processed reading the config, the absolute
path obtained was wrong.
With this fix the absolute path is obtained before processing the
configuration while the server is still in the original directory where
it was executed.
The code tried to obtain the configuration file absolute path after
processing the configuration file. However if config file was a relative
path and a "dir" statement was processed reading the config, the absolute
path obtained was wrong.
With this fix the absolute path is obtained before processing the
configuration while the server is still in the original directory where
it was executed.
Now it logs the file name if it is not accessible. Also there is a
different error for the missing config file case, and for the non
writable file case.
Now it logs the file name if it is not accessible. Also there is a
different error for the missing config file case, and for the non
writable file case.
server.unixtime and server.mstime are cached less precise timestamps
that we use every time we don't need an accurate time representation and
a syscall would be too slow for the number of calls we require.
Such an example is the initialization and update process of the last
interaction time with the client, that is used for timeouts.
However rdbLoad() can take some time to load the DB, but at the same
time it did not updated the time during DB loading. This resulted in the
bug described in issue #1535, where in the replication process the slave
loads the DB, creates the redisClient representation of its master, but
the timestamp is so old that the master, under certain conditions, is
sensed as already "timed out".
Thanks to @yoav-steinberg and Redis Labs Inc for the bug report and
analysis.
server.unixtime and server.mstime are cached less precise timestamps
that we use every time we don't need an accurate time representation and
a syscall would be too slow for the number of calls we require.
Such an example is the initialization and update process of the last
interaction time with the client, that is used for timeouts.
However rdbLoad() can take some time to load the DB, but at the same
time it did not updated the time during DB loading. This resulted in the
bug described in issue #1535, where in the replication process the slave
loads the DB, creates the redisClient representation of its master, but
the timestamp is so old that the master, under certain conditions, is
sensed as already "timed out".
Thanks to @yoav-steinberg and Redis Labs Inc for the bug report and
analysis.
This commit fixes a serious Lua scripting replication issue, described
by Github issue #1549. The root cause of the problem is that scripts
were put inside the script cache, assuming that slaves and AOF already
contained it, even if the scripts sometimes produced no changes in the
data set, and were not actaully propagated to AOF/slaves.
Example:
eval "if tonumber(KEYS[1]) > 0 then redis.call('incr', 'x') end" 1 0
Then:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 0
At this step sha1 of the script is added to the replication script cache
(the script is marked as known to the slaves) and EVALSHA command is
transformed to EVAL. However it is not dirty (there is no changes to db),
so it is not propagated to the slaves. Then the script is called again:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 1
At this step master checks that the script already exists in the
replication script cache and doesn't transform it to EVAL command. It is
dirty and propagated to the slaves, but they fail to evaluate the script
as they don't have it in the script cache.
The fix is trivial and just uses the new API to force the propagation of
the executed command regardless of the dirty state of the data set.
Thank you to @minus-infinity on Github for finding the issue,
understanding the root cause, and fixing it.
This commit fixes a serious Lua scripting replication issue, described
by Github issue #1549. The root cause of the problem is that scripts
were put inside the script cache, assuming that slaves and AOF already
contained it, even if the scripts sometimes produced no changes in the
data set, and were not actaully propagated to AOF/slaves.
Example:
eval "if tonumber(KEYS[1]) > 0 then redis.call('incr', 'x') end" 1 0
Then:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 0
At this step sha1 of the script is added to the replication script cache
(the script is marked as known to the slaves) and EVALSHA command is
transformed to EVAL. However it is not dirty (there is no changes to db),
so it is not propagated to the slaves. Then the script is called again:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 1
At this step master checks that the script already exists in the
replication script cache and doesn't transform it to EVAL command. It is
dirty and propagated to the slaves, but they fail to evaluate the script
as they don't have it in the script cache.
The fix is trivial and just uses the new API to force the propagation of
the executed command regardless of the dirty state of the data set.
Thank you to @minus-infinity on Github for finding the issue,
understanding the root cause, and fixing it.
A system similar to the RDB write error handling is used, in which when
we can't write to the AOF file, writes are no longer accepted until we
are able to write again.
For fsync == always we still abort on errors since there is currently no
easy way to avoid replying with success to the user otherwise, and this
would violate the contract with the user of only acknowledging data
already secured on disk.
A system similar to the RDB write error handling is used, in which when
we can't write to the AOF file, writes are no longer accepted until we
are able to write again.
For fsync == always we still abort on errors since there is currently no
easy way to avoid replying with success to the user otherwise, and this
would violate the contract with the user of only acknowledging data
already secured on disk.
Avoid to trash a configEpoch for every slot migrated if this node has
already the max configEpoch across the cluster.
Still work to do in this area but this avoids both ending with a very
high configEpoch without any reason and to flood the system with fsyncs.
Avoid to trash a configEpoch for every slot migrated if this node has
already the max configEpoch across the cluster.
Still work to do in this area but this avoids both ending with a very
high configEpoch without any reason and to flood the system with fsyncs.
The actual goal of the function was to get the max configEpoch found in
the cluster, so make it general by removing the assignment of the max
epoch to currentEpoch that is useful only at startup.
The actual goal of the function was to get the max configEpoch found in
the cluster, so make it general by removing the assignment of the max
epoch to currentEpoch that is useful only at startup.
Removed a stale conditional preventing the configEpoch from incrementing
after the import in certain conditions. Since the master got a new slot
it should always claim a new configuration.
Removed a stale conditional preventing the configEpoch from incrementing
after the import in certain conditions. Since the master got a new slot
it should always claim a new configuration.
The node receiving the hash slot needs to have a version that wins over
the other versions in order to force the ownership of the slot.
However the current code is far from perfect since a failover can happen
during the manual resharding. The fix is a work in progress but the
bottom line is that the new version must either be voted as usually,
set by redis-trib manually after it makes sure can't be used by other
nodes, or reserved configEpochs could be used for manual operations (for
example odd versions could be never used by slaves and are always used
by CLUSTER SETSLOT NODE).
The node receiving the hash slot needs to have a version that wins over
the other versions in order to force the ownership of the slot.
However the current code is far from perfect since a failover can happen
during the manual resharding. The fix is a work in progress but the
bottom line is that the new version must either be voted as usually,
set by redis-trib manually after it makes sure can't be used by other
nodes, or reserved configEpochs could be used for manual operations (for
example odd versions could be never used by slaves and are always used
by CLUSTER SETSLOT NODE).
During slots migration redis-trib can send a number of SETSLOT commands.
Fsyncing every time is a bit too much in production as verified
empirically.
To make sure configs are fsynced on all nodes after a resharding
redis-trib may send something like CLUSTER CONFSYNC.
In this case fsyncs were not providing too much value since anyway
processes can crash in the middle of the resharding of an hash slot, and
redis-trib should be able to recover from this condition anyway.
During slots migration redis-trib can send a number of SETSLOT commands.
Fsyncing every time is a bit too much in production as verified
empirically.
To make sure configs are fsynced on all nodes after a resharding
redis-trib may send something like CLUSTER CONFSYNC.
In this case fsyncs were not providing too much value since anyway
processes can crash in the middle of the resharding of an hash slot, and
redis-trib should be able to recover from this condition anyway.
