The commit splits the add functions into a set() and add() set of
functions, so that it's possible to set registers in an independent way
just having the index and count.
Related to #3819, otherwise a fix is not possible.
However note that in architectures supporting 64 bit unaligned
accesses memcpy(...,...,8) is likely translated to a simple
word memory movement anyway.
The new algorithm provides the same speed with a smaller error for
cardinalities in the range 0-100k. Before switching, the new and old
algorithm behavior was studied in details in the context of
issue #3677. You can find a few graphs and motivations there.
Otherwise for small cardinalities the algorithm will output something
like, for example, 4.99 for a candinality of 5, that will be converted
to 4 producing a huge error.
Slaves key expire is orchestrated by the master. Sometimes the master
will send the synthesized DEL to expire keys on the slave with a non
trivial delay (when the key is not accessed, only the incremental expiry
algorithm will expire it in background).
During that time, a key is logically expired, but slaves still return
the key if you GET (or whatever) it. This is a bad behavior.
However we can't simply trust the slave view of the key, since we need
the master to be able to send write commands to update the slave data
set, and DELs should only happen when the key is expired in the master
in order to ensure consistency.
However 99.99% of the issues with this behavior is when a client which
is not a master sends a read only command. In this case we are safe and
can consider the key as non existing.
This commit does a few changes in order to make this sane:
1. lookupKeyRead() is modified in order to return NULL if the above
conditions are met.
2. Calls to lookupKeyRead() in commands actually writing to the data set
are repliaced with calls to lookupKeyWrite().
There are redundand checks, so for example, if in "2" something was
overlooked, we should be still safe, since anyway, when the master
writes the behavior is to don't care about what expireIfneeded()
returns.
This commit is related to #1768, #1770, #2131.
This is just a quickfix, for the nature of the test the right way to fix
it is to average the error of N runs, since otherwise it is always
possible to get a false positive with a bad run, or to minimize too much
this possibility we may end testing with too much "large" error ranges.
The internal HLL raw encoding used by PFCOUNT when merging multiple keys
is aligned to 8 bits (1 byte per register) so we can exploit this to
improve performances by processing multiple bytes per iteration.
In benchmarks the new code was several times faster with HLLs with many
registers set to zero, while no slowdown was observed with populated
HLLs.
When the register is set to zero, we need to add 2^-0 to E, which is 1,
but it is faster to just add 'ez' at the end, which is the number of
registers set to zero, a value we need to compute anyway.
After running a few benchmarks, 3000 looks like a reasonable value to
keep HLLs with a few thousand elements small while the CPU cost is
still not huge.
This covers all the cases where the dense representation would use N
orders of magnitude more space, like in the case of many HLLs with
carinality of a few tens or hundreds.
It is not impossible that in the future this gets user configurable,
however it is easy to pick an unreasoable value just looking at savings
in the space dimension without checking what happens in the time
dimension.
Bulk length for registers was emitted too early, so if there was a bug
the reply looked like a long array with just one element, blocking the
client as result.
