However we don't try to do this if the integer is already inside a range
representable with a shared integer.
The performance gain appears to be around ~15% in micro benchmarks,
however in the long run this also helps to improve locality, so should
have more, hard to measure, benefits.
However we don't try to do this if the integer is already inside a range
representable with a shared integer.
The performance gain appears to be around ~15% in micro benchmarks,
however in the long run this also helps to improve locality, so should
have more, hard to measure, benefits.
Some language in the comment was difficult
to understand, so this commit: clarifies wording, removes
unnecessary words, and relocates some dependent clauses
closer to what they actually describe.
I also tried to break up longer chains of thought
(if X, then Y, and Q, and also F, so obviously M)
into more manageable chunks for ease of understanding.
Some language in the comment was difficult
to understand, so this commit: clarifies wording, removes
unnecessary words, and relocates some dependent clauses
closer to what they actually describe.
I also tried to break up longer chains of thought
(if X, then Y, and Q, and also F, so obviously M)
into more manageable chunks for ease of understanding.
- Remove trailing newlines from redis.conf
- Fix comment misspelling
- Clarifies zipEncodeLength usage and a C API mention (#1243, #1242)
- Fix cluster typos (inspired by @papanikge #1507)
- Fix rewite -> rewrite in a few places (inspired by #682)
Closes#1243, #1242, #1507
- Remove trailing newlines from redis.conf
- Fix comment misspelling
- Clarifies zipEncodeLength usage and a C API mention (#1243, #1242)
- Fix cluster typos (inspired by @papanikge #1507)
- Fix rewite -> rewrite in a few places (inspired by #682)
Closes#1243, #1242, #1507
