these metrics become negative when RSS is smaller than the used_memory.
This can easily happen when the program allocated a lot of memory and haven't
written to it yet, in which case the kernel doesn't allocate any pages to the process
In MEMORY USAGE command, we count the key argv[2] into usage,
but the argument in command may contains free spaces because of
sdsMakeRoomFor. But the key in db never contains free spaces
because we use sdsdup when dbAdd, so using the real key to
count the usage is more accurate.
If we encounter an unsupported protocol in the "bind" list, don't
ipso-facto consider it a fatal error. We continue to abort startup if
there are no listening sockets at all.
This ensures that the lack of IPv6 support does not prevent Redis from
starting on Debian where we try to bind to the ::1 interface by default
(via "bind 127.0.0.1 ::1"). A machine with IPv6 disabled (such as some
container systems) would simply fail to start Redis after the initiall
call to apt(8).
This is similar to the case for where "bind" is not specified:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3894
... and was based on the corresponding PR:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/pull/4108
... but also adds EADDRNOTAVAIL to the list of errors to catch which I
believe is missing from there.
This issue was raised in Debian as both <https://bugs.debian.org/900284>
& <https://bugs.debian.org/914354>.
This really helps spot it in the logs, otherwise it does not look like a
warning/error. For example:
Creating Server TCP listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
... is not nearly as clear as:
Could not create server TCP listening listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
This commit fixes#5570. It is a similar bug to one fixed a few weeks
ago and is due to the range API to be called with NULL as "end ID"
parameter instead of repeating again the start ID, to be sure that we
selectively issue the entry with a given ID, or we get zero returned
(and we know we should emit a NULL reply).
This fixes the issue reported in #5570.
This was fixed the hard way, that is, propagating more information to
the lower level API about this being a request to read just the history,
so that the code is simpler and less likely to regress.
