Track bandwidth used by clients and replication (but diskless
replication is not tracked since the actual transfer happens in the
child process).
This includes a refactoring that makes tracking new instantaneous
metrics simpler.
Track bandwidth used by clients and replication (but diskless
replication is not tracked since the actual transfer happens in the
child process).
This includes a refactoring that makes tracking new instantaneous
metrics simpler.
PFCOUNT is technically speaking a write command, since the cached value
of the HLL is exposed in the data structure (design error, mea culpa), and
can be modified by PFCOUNT.
However if we flag PFCOUNT as "w", read only slaves can't execute the
command, which is a problem since there are environments where slaves
are used to scale PFCOUNT reads.
Nor it is possible to just prevent PFCOUNT to modify the data structure
in slaves, since without the cache we lose too much efficiency.
So while this commit allows slaves to create a temporary inconsistency
(the strings representing the HLLs in the master and slave can be
different in certain moments) it is actually harmless.
In the long run this should be probably fixed by turning the HLL into a
more opaque representation, for example by storing the cached value in
the part of the string which is not exposed (this should be possible
with SDS strings).
PFCOUNT is technically speaking a write command, since the cached value
of the HLL is exposed in the data structure (design error, mea culpa), and
can be modified by PFCOUNT.
However if we flag PFCOUNT as "w", read only slaves can't execute the
command, which is a problem since there are environments where slaves
are used to scale PFCOUNT reads.
Nor it is possible to just prevent PFCOUNT to modify the data structure
in slaves, since without the cache we lose too much efficiency.
So while this commit allows slaves to create a temporary inconsistency
(the strings representing the HLLs in the master and slave can be
different in certain moments) it is actually harmless.
In the long run this should be probably fixed by turning the HLL into a
more opaque representation, for example by storing the cached value in
the part of the string which is not exposed (this should be possible
with SDS strings).
bulk_data field size was not removed from the count. It is not possible
to declare it simply as 'char bulk_data[]' since the structure is nested
into another structure.
bulk_data field size was not removed from the count. It is not possible
to declare it simply as 'char bulk_data[]' since the structure is nested
into another structure.
Because of (not so) recent Redis changes, now the LRU internally
reported unit is milliseconds, not seconds, but the DEBUG OBJECT output
was still claiming seconds while providing milliseconds.
However OBJECT IDLETIME was working as expected, which is the correct
API to use.
Because of (not so) recent Redis changes, now the LRU internally
reported unit is milliseconds, not seconds, but the DEBUG OBJECT output
was still claiming seconds while providing milliseconds.
However OBJECT IDLETIME was working as expected, which is the correct
API to use.
zmalloc(0) cauesd to actually trigger a non-zero allocation since with
standard libc malloc we have our own zmalloc header for memory tracking,
but at the same time the returned pointer is at the end of the block and
not in the middle. This triggers a false positive when testing with
valgrind.
When the inline protocol args count is 0, we now avoid reallocating
c->argv, preventing the issue to happen.
zmalloc(0) cauesd to actually trigger a non-zero allocation since with
standard libc malloc we have our own zmalloc header for memory tracking,
but at the same time the returned pointer is at the end of the block and
not in the middle. This triggers a false positive when testing with
valgrind.
When the inline protocol args count is 0, we now avoid reallocating
c->argv, preventing the issue to happen.
Issue: #2157
As the SET command is parsed, it remembers which options are already set
and if a duplicate option is found, raises an error because it is
essentially an invalid syntax.
It still allows mutually exclusive options like EX and PX because taking
an option over another (precedence) is not essentially a syntactic
error.
Issue: #2157
As the SET command is parsed, it remembers which options are already set
and if a duplicate option is found, raises an error because it is
essentially an invalid syntax.
It still allows mutually exclusive options like EX and PX because taking
an option over another (precedence) is not essentially a syntactic
error.
Sentinel queries the INFO from every master and from every replica of
every master.
We can cache the INFO results in Sentinel so Sentinel can be a single
place to quickly get all INFO output for an entire Sentinel monitoring
group.
This commit gives us SENTINEL INFO-CACHE in two forms:
- SENTINEL INFO-CACHE — returns all masters and all replicas
- SENTINEL INFO-CACHE master0 master1 ... masterN — vararg specify masters
Results are returned as a multibulk reply with two top-level entries
for each master. The first entry for each master is the name of the master.
The second entry is a nested multibulk reply with the contents of INFO,
first for the master, then an additional entry for each of the
replicas.
Sentinel queries the INFO from every master and from every replica of
every master.
We can cache the INFO results in Sentinel so Sentinel can be a single
place to quickly get all INFO output for an entire Sentinel monitoring
group.
This commit gives us SENTINEL INFO-CACHE in two forms:
- SENTINEL INFO-CACHE — returns all masters and all replicas
- SENTINEL INFO-CACHE master0 master1 ... masterN — vararg specify masters
Results are returned as a multibulk reply with two top-level entries
for each master. The first entry for each master is the name of the master.
The second entry is a nested multibulk reply with the contents of INFO,
first for the master, then an additional entry for each of the
replicas.
