This commit attempts to fix a number of bugs reported in #4316.
They are related to the way replication info like replication ID,
offsets, and currently selected DB in the master client, are stored
and loaded by Redis. In order to avoid inconsistencies the changes in
this commit try to enforce that:
1. Replication information are only stored when the RDB file is
generated by a slave that has a valid 'master' client, so that we can
always extract the currently selected DB.
2. When replication informations are persisted in the RDB file, all the
info for a successful PSYNC or nothing is persisted.
3. The RDB replication informations are only loaded if the instance is
configured as a slave, otherwise a master can start with IDs that relate
to a different history of the data set, and stil retain such IDs in the
future while receiving unrelated writes.
A slave may be started with an RDB file able to provide enough slave to
perform a successful partial SYNC with its master. However in such a
case, how outlined in issue #4268, the slave backlog will not be
started, since it was only initialized on full syncs attempts. This
creates different problems with successive PSYNC attempts that will
always result in full synchronizations.
Thanks to @fdingiit for discovering the issue.
A slave may be started with an RDB file able to provide enough slave to
perform a successful partial SYNC with its master. However in such a
case, how outlined in issue #4268, the slave backlog will not be
started, since it was only initialized on full syncs attempts. This
creates different problems with successive PSYNC attempts that will
always result in full synchronizations.
Thanks to @fdingiit for discovering the issue.
A slave may be started with an RDB file able to provide enough slave to
perform a successful partial SYNC with its master. However in such a
case, how outlined in issue #4268, the slave backlog will not be
started, since it was only initialized on full syncs attempts. This
creates different problems with successive PSYNC attempts that will
always result in full synchronizations.
Thanks to @fdingiit for discovering the issue.
when SHUTDOWN command is recived it is possible that some of the recent
command were not yet flushed from the AOF buffer, and the server
experiences data loss at shutdown.
when SHUTDOWN command is recived it is possible that some of the recent
command were not yet flushed from the AOF buffer, and the server
experiences data loss at shutdown.
when SHUTDOWN command is recived it is possible that some of the recent
command were not yet flushed from the AOF buffer, and the server
experiences data loss at shutdown.
