When HAVE_MALLOC_SIZE is false, each call to zrealloc causes used_memory
to increase by PREFIX_SIZE more than it should, due to mis-matched
accounting between the original zmalloc (which includes PREFIX size in
its increment) and zrealloc (which misses it from its decrement).
I've also supplied a command-line test to easily demonstrate the
problem. It's not wired into the test framework, because I don't know
TCL so I'm not sure how to automate it.
When HAVE_MALLOC_SIZE is false, each call to zrealloc causes used_memory
to increase by PREFIX_SIZE more than it should, due to mis-matched
accounting between the original zmalloc (which includes PREFIX size in
its increment) and zrealloc (which misses it from its decrement).
I've also supplied a command-line test to easily demonstrate the
problem. It's not wired into the test framework, because I don't know
TCL so I'm not sure how to automate it.
When HAVE_MALLOC_SIZE is false, each call to zrealloc causes used_memory
to increase by PREFIX_SIZE more than it should, due to mis-matched
accounting between the original zmalloc (which includes PREFIX size in
its increment) and zrealloc (which misses it from its decrement).
I've also supplied a command-line test to easily demonstrate the
problem. It's not wired into the test framework, because I don't know
TCL so I'm not sure how to automate it.
sdsZmallocSize assumes a dynamically allocated SDS. When given a string
object created by createEmbeddedStringObject, it calls zmalloc_size on a
pointer that isn't the one returned by zmalloc
sdsZmallocSize assumes a dynamically allocated SDS. When given a string
object created by createEmbeddedStringObject, it calls zmalloc_size on a
pointer that isn't the one returned by zmalloc
sdsZmallocSize assumes a dynamically allocated SDS. When given a string
object created by createEmbeddedStringObject, it calls zmalloc_size on a
pointer that isn't the one returned by zmalloc
There are two problems if we use lastcmd:
1. BRPOPLPUSH cannot be rewrited as RPOPLPUSH in multi/exec
In mulit/exec context, the lastcmd is exec.
2. Redis will crash when execute RPOPLPUSH loading from AOF
In fakeClient, the lastcmd is NULL.
There are two problems if we use lastcmd:
1. BRPOPLPUSH cannot be rewrited as RPOPLPUSH in multi/exec
In mulit/exec context, the lastcmd is exec.
2. Redis will crash when execute RPOPLPUSH loading from AOF
In fakeClient, the lastcmd is NULL.
There are two problems if we use lastcmd:
1. BRPOPLPUSH cannot be rewrited as RPOPLPUSH in multi/exec
In mulit/exec context, the lastcmd is exec.
2. Redis will crash when execute RPOPLPUSH loading from AOF
In fakeClient, the lastcmd is NULL.
