The `Tracking gets notification of expired keys` test in tracking.tcl
used to hung in valgrind CI quite a lot.
It turns out the reason is that with valgrind and a busy machine, the
server cron active expire cycle could easily run in the same event loop
as the command that created `mykey`, so that when they key got expired,
there were two change events to broadcast, one that set the key and one
that expired it, but since we used raxTryInsert, the client that was
associated with the "last" change was the one that created the key, so
the NOLOOP filtered that event.
This commit adds a test that reproduces the problem by using lazy expire
in a multi-exec which makes sure the key expires in the same event loop
as the one that added it.
(cherry picked from commit 9b564b525d8ce88295ec14ffdc3bede7e5f5c33e)
When redis responds with tracking-redir-broken push message (RESP3),
it was responding with a broken protocol: an array of 3 elements, but only
pushes 2 elements.
Some bugs in the test make this pass. Read the push reply
will consume an extra reply, because the reply length is 3, but there
are only two elements, so the next reply will be treated as third
element. So the test is corrected too.
Other changes:
* checkPrefixCollisionsOrReply success should return 1 instead of -1,
this bug didn't have any implications.
* improve client tracking tests to validate more of the response it reads.
This adds basic coverage to IO threads by running the cluster and few selected Redis test suite tests with the IO threads enabled.
Also provides some necessary additional improvements to the test suite:
* Add --config to sentinel/cluster tests for arbitrary configuration.
* Fix --tags whitelisting which was broken.
* Add a `network` tag to some tests that are more network intensive. This is work in progress and more tests should be properly tagged in the future.
When a Lua script returns a map to redis (a feature which was added in
redis 6 together with RESP3), it would have returned the value first and
the key second.
If the client was using RESP2, it was getting them out of order, and if
the client was in RESP3, it was getting a map of value => key.
This was happening regardless of the Lua script using redis.setresp(3)
or not.
This also affects a case where the script was returning a map which it got
from from redis by doing something like: redis.setresp(3); return redis.call()
This fix is a breaking change for redis 6.0 users who happened to rely
on the wrong order (either ones that used redis.setresp(3), or ones that
returned a map explicitly).
This commit also includes other two changes in the tests:
1. The test suite now handles RESP3 maps as dicts rather than nested
lists
2. Remove some redundant (duplicate) tests from tracking.tcl
Test support for the new map, null and push message types. Map objects are parsed as a list of lists of key value pairs.
for instance: user => john password => 123
will be parsed to the following TCL list:
{{user john} {password 123}}
Also added the following tests:
Redirection still works with RESP3
Able to use a RESP3 client as a redirection client
No duplicate invalidation messages when turning BCAST mode on after normal tracking
Server is able to evacuate enough keys when num of keys surpasses limit by more than defined initial effort
Different clients using different protocols can track the same key
OPTOUT tests
OPTIN tests
Clients can redirect to the same connection
tracking-redir-broken test
HELLO 3 checks
Invalidation messages still work when using RESP3, with and without redirection
Switching to RESP3 doesn't disturb previous tracked keys
Tracking info is correct
Flushall and flushdb produce invalidation messages
These tests achieve 100% line coverage for tracking.c using lcov.
PROBLEM:
[$rd1 read] reads invalidation messages one by one, so it's never going to see the second invalidation message produced after INCR b, whether or not it exists. Adding another read will block incase no invalidation message is produced.
FIX:
We switch the order of "INCR a" and "INCR b" - now "INCR b" comes first. We still only read the first invalidation message produces. If an invalidation message is wrongly produces for b - then it will be produced before that of a, since "INCR b" comes before "INCR a".
Co-authored-by: Nitai Caro <caronita@amazon.com>
