The default cluster control port is 10,000 ports higher than
the base Redis port. If Redis is started on a too-high port,
Cluster can't start and everything will exit later anyway.
The default cluster control port is 10,000 ports higher than
the base Redis port. If Redis is started on a too-high port,
Cluster can't start and everything will exit later anyway.
Report the actual port used for the listening attempt instead of
server.port.
Originally, Redis would just listen on server.port.
But, with clustering, Redis uses a Cluster Port too,
so we can't say server.port is always where we are listening.
If you tried to launch Redis with a too-high port number (any
port where Port+10000 > 65535), Redis would refuse to start, but
only print an error saying it can't connect to the Redis port.
This patch fixes much confusions.
Report the actual port used for the listening attempt instead of
server.port.
Originally, Redis would just listen on server.port.
But, with clustering, Redis uses a Cluster Port too,
so we can't say server.port is always where we are listening.
If you tried to launch Redis with a too-high port number (any
port where Port+10000 > 65535), Redis would refuse to start, but
only print an error saying it can't connect to the Redis port.
This patch fixes much confusions.
If we can't reconfigure a slave in time during failover, go forward as
anyway the slave will be fixed by Sentinels in the future, once they
detect it is misconfigured.
Otherwise a failover in progress may never terminate if for some reason
the slave is uncapable to sync with the master while at the same time
it is not disconnected.
If we can't reconfigure a slave in time during failover, go forward as
anyway the slave will be fixed by Sentinels in the future, once they
detect it is misconfigured.
Otherwise a failover in progress may never terminate if for some reason
the slave is uncapable to sync with the master while at the same time
it is not disconnected.
Some inline test moved into server_is_up procedure.
Also find_available_port was moved into util since it is going
to be used for the Sentinel test as well.
Some inline test moved into server_is_up procedure.
Also find_available_port was moved into util since it is going
to be used for the Sentinel test as well.
The code tried to obtain the configuration file absolute path after
processing the configuration file. However if config file was a relative
path and a "dir" statement was processed reading the config, the absolute
path obtained was wrong.
With this fix the absolute path is obtained before processing the
configuration while the server is still in the original directory where
it was executed.
The code tried to obtain the configuration file absolute path after
processing the configuration file. However if config file was a relative
path and a "dir" statement was processed reading the config, the absolute
path obtained was wrong.
With this fix the absolute path is obtained before processing the
configuration while the server is still in the original directory where
it was executed.
Now it logs the file name if it is not accessible. Also there is a
different error for the missing config file case, and for the non
writable file case.
Now it logs the file name if it is not accessible. Also there is a
different error for the missing config file case, and for the non
writable file case.
server.unixtime and server.mstime are cached less precise timestamps
that we use every time we don't need an accurate time representation and
a syscall would be too slow for the number of calls we require.
Such an example is the initialization and update process of the last
interaction time with the client, that is used for timeouts.
However rdbLoad() can take some time to load the DB, but at the same
time it did not updated the time during DB loading. This resulted in the
bug described in issue #1535, where in the replication process the slave
loads the DB, creates the redisClient representation of its master, but
the timestamp is so old that the master, under certain conditions, is
sensed as already "timed out".
Thanks to @yoav-steinberg and Redis Labs Inc for the bug report and
analysis.
server.unixtime and server.mstime are cached less precise timestamps
that we use every time we don't need an accurate time representation and
a syscall would be too slow for the number of calls we require.
Such an example is the initialization and update process of the last
interaction time with the client, that is used for timeouts.
However rdbLoad() can take some time to load the DB, but at the same
time it did not updated the time during DB loading. This resulted in the
bug described in issue #1535, where in the replication process the slave
loads the DB, creates the redisClient representation of its master, but
the timestamp is so old that the master, under certain conditions, is
sensed as already "timed out".
Thanks to @yoav-steinberg and Redis Labs Inc for the bug report and
analysis.
This commit fixes a serious Lua scripting replication issue, described
by Github issue #1549. The root cause of the problem is that scripts
were put inside the script cache, assuming that slaves and AOF already
contained it, even if the scripts sometimes produced no changes in the
data set, and were not actaully propagated to AOF/slaves.
Example:
eval "if tonumber(KEYS[1]) > 0 then redis.call('incr', 'x') end" 1 0
Then:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 0
At this step sha1 of the script is added to the replication script cache
(the script is marked as known to the slaves) and EVALSHA command is
transformed to EVAL. However it is not dirty (there is no changes to db),
so it is not propagated to the slaves. Then the script is called again:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 1
At this step master checks that the script already exists in the
replication script cache and doesn't transform it to EVAL command. It is
dirty and propagated to the slaves, but they fail to evaluate the script
as they don't have it in the script cache.
The fix is trivial and just uses the new API to force the propagation of
the executed command regardless of the dirty state of the data set.
Thank you to @minus-infinity on Github for finding the issue,
understanding the root cause, and fixing it.
This commit fixes a serious Lua scripting replication issue, described
by Github issue #1549. The root cause of the problem is that scripts
were put inside the script cache, assuming that slaves and AOF already
contained it, even if the scripts sometimes produced no changes in the
data set, and were not actaully propagated to AOF/slaves.
Example:
eval "if tonumber(KEYS[1]) > 0 then redis.call('incr', 'x') end" 1 0
Then:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 0
At this step sha1 of the script is added to the replication script cache
(the script is marked as known to the slaves) and EVALSHA command is
transformed to EVAL. However it is not dirty (there is no changes to db),
so it is not propagated to the slaves. Then the script is called again:
evalsha <sha1 step 1 script> 1 1
At this step master checks that the script already exists in the
replication script cache and doesn't transform it to EVAL command. It is
dirty and propagated to the slaves, but they fail to evaluate the script
as they don't have it in the script cache.
The fix is trivial and just uses the new API to force the propagation of
the executed command regardless of the dirty state of the data set.
Thank you to @minus-infinity on Github for finding the issue,
understanding the root cause, and fixing it.
A system similar to the RDB write error handling is used, in which when
we can't write to the AOF file, writes are no longer accepted until we
are able to write again.
For fsync == always we still abort on errors since there is currently no
easy way to avoid replying with success to the user otherwise, and this
would violate the contract with the user of only acknowledging data
already secured on disk.
