1. HVSTRLEN -> HSTRLEN. It's unlikely one needs the length of the key,
not clear how the API would work (by value does not make sense) and
there will be better names anyway.
2. Default is to return 0 when field is missing.
3. Default is to return 0 when key is missing.
4. The implementation was slower than needed, and produced unnecessary COW.
Related issue #2415.
1. HVSTRLEN -> HSTRLEN. It's unlikely one needs the length of the key,
not clear how the API would work (by value does not make sense) and
there will be better names anyway.
2. Default is to return 0 when field is missing.
3. Default is to return 0 when key is missing.
4. The implementation was slower than needed, and produced unnecessary COW.
Related issue #2415.
1. Remove useless "cs" initialization.
2. Add a "select" var to capture a condition checked multiple times.
3. Avoid duplication of the same if (!copy) conditional.
4. Don't increment dirty if copy is given (no deletion is performed),
otherwise we propagate MIGRATE when not needed.
1. Remove useless "cs" initialization.
2. Add a "select" var to capture a condition checked multiple times.
3. Avoid duplication of the same if (!copy) conditional.
4. Don't increment dirty if copy is given (no deletion is performed),
otherwise we propagate MIGRATE when not needed.
It's hard to pick a good approach here. A few arguments:
1) There are many exposed instances on the internet.
2) Changing the default when "bind" is not given is very dangerous,
after an upgrade the server changes a fundamental behavior.
3) Usually Redis, when used in a proper way, will be protected *and*
accessed often from other computers, so this new default is likely
not what most people want.
4) However if users end with this default, they are using the example
redis.conf: likely they are reading what is inside, and they'll see
the warning.
It's hard to pick a good approach here. A few arguments:
1) There are many exposed instances on the internet.
2) Changing the default when "bind" is not given is very dangerous,
after an upgrade the server changes a fundamental behavior.
3) Usually Redis, when used in a proper way, will be protected *and*
accessed often from other computers, so this new default is likely
not what most people want.
4) However if users end with this default, they are using the example
redis.conf: likely they are reading what is inside, and they'll see
the warning.
