If one thread got SIGSEGV, function sigsegvHandler() would be triggered,
it would call bioKillThreads(). But call pthread_cancel() to cancel itself
would make it block. Also note that if SIGSEGV is caught by bio thread, it
should kill the main thread in order to give a positive report.
Rather than blindly evicting until maxmemory limit is achieved, this
update adds a time limit to eviction. While over the maxmemory limit,
eviction will process before each command AND as a timeProc when no
commands are running.
This will reduce the latency impact on many cases, especially pathological
cases like massive used memory increase during dict rehashing.
There is a risk that some other edge cases (like massive pipelined use
of MGET) could cause Redis memory usage to keep growing despite the
eviction attempts, so a new maxmemory-eviction-tenacity config is
introduced to let users mitigate that.
Rather than blindly evicting until maxmemory limit is achieved, this
update adds a time limit to eviction. While over the maxmemory limit,
eviction will process before each command AND as a timeProc when no
commands are running.
This will reduce the latency impact on many cases, especially pathological
cases like massive used memory increase during dict rehashing.
There is a risk that some other edge cases (like massive pipelined use
of MGET) could cause Redis memory usage to keep growing despite the
eviction attempts, so a new maxmemory-eviction-tenacity config is
introduced to let users mitigate that.
This commit makes stream object returning "stream" as encoding type in OBJECT ENCODING subcommand and DEBUG OBJECT command.
Till now, it would return "unknown"
This commit makes stream object returning "stream" as encoding type in OBJECT ENCODING subcommand and DEBUG OBJECT command.
Till now, it would return "unknown"
This test was nearly always failing on MacOS github actions.
This is because of bugs in the test that caused it to nearly always run
all 3 attempts and just look at the last one as the pass/fail creteria.
i.e. the test was nearly always running all 3 attempts and still sometimes
succeed. this is because the break condition was different than the test
completion condition.
The reason the test succeeded is because the break condition tested the
results of all 3 tests (PSETEX/PEXPIRE/PEXPIREAT), but the success check
at the end was only testing the result of PSETEX.
The reason the PEXPIREAT test nearly always failed is because it was
getting the current time wrong: getting the current second and loosing
the sub-section time, so the only chance for it to succeed is if it run
right when a certain second started.
Because i now get the time from redis, adding another round trip, i
added another 100ms to the PEXPIRE test to make it less fragile, and
also added many more attempts.
Adding many more attempts before failure to account for slow platforms,
github actions and valgrind
This test was nearly always failing on MacOS github actions.
This is because of bugs in the test that caused it to nearly always run
all 3 attempts and just look at the last one as the pass/fail creteria.
i.e. the test was nearly always running all 3 attempts and still sometimes
succeed. this is because the break condition was different than the test
completion condition.
The reason the test succeeded is because the break condition tested the
results of all 3 tests (PSETEX/PEXPIRE/PEXPIREAT), but the success check
at the end was only testing the result of PSETEX.
The reason the PEXPIREAT test nearly always failed is because it was
getting the current time wrong: getting the current second and loosing
the sub-section time, so the only chance for it to succeed is if it run
right when a certain second started.
Because i now get the time from redis, adding another round trip, i
added another 100ms to the PEXPIRE test to make it less fragile, and
also added many more attempts.
Adding many more attempts before failure to account for slow platforms,
github actions and valgrind
The key save delay is too short and on certain systems the child process
is gone before we have a chance to inspect it.
(cherry picked from commit 1abc94155a26356f7fcaf5d20b80f031a55a3e82)
The key save delay is too short and on certain systems the child process
is gone before we have a chance to inspect it.
(cherry picked from commit b2a73c404bf277bac287c72494a4c4cd2ba02f8c)
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit b1de173ec0f6a03d6083b87f1505fbf843708685)
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit 042189fd8707544139337b3ddcf38b5c5fea1bf0)
This is a catch-all test to confirm that that rewrite produces a valid
output for all parameters and that this process does not introduce
undesired configuration changes.
(cherry picked from commit 995f1fc53f7daf3d289d5d70d7b45cdd486dc6cc)
This is a catch-all test to confirm that that rewrite produces a valid
output for all parameters and that this process does not introduce
undesired configuration changes.
(cherry picked from commit a8b7268911803f4ac827ab22e8e5b10134664832)
Improve RM_Call inline documentation about the fmt argument
so that we don't completely depend on the web docs.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit c13fa0aa3619c595f06e191a30710d85a109ad48)
Improve RM_Call inline documentation about the fmt argument
so that we don't completely depend on the web docs.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit ce15620dc17ebad94cd03cb4ee779fdd4e99b212)
THP can also be set to madvise, in which case it shouldn't cause
problems for Redis since redis (or the allocator) doesn't use madvise
to activate it.
(cherry picked from commit 60097d361d4096d3826c7580acffd4053f8a4835)
THP can also be set to madvise, in which case it shouldn't cause
problems for Redis since redis (or the allocator) doesn't use madvise
to activate it.
(cherry picked from commit b2419c31c166bd2d73f7af3d089859795c0e3506)
There was a bug. Although cluster replicas would allow read commands,
they would not allow a MULTI-EXEC that's composed solely of read commands.
Adds tests for coverage.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Eran Liberty <eranl@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7bee51bb5b2cccbaae76f4721761880acf4d5a93)
There was a bug. Although cluster replicas would allow read commands,
they would not allow a MULTI-EXEC that's composed solely of read commands.
Adds tests for coverage.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Eran Liberty <eranl@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit b120366d48d9e488a406965773e64f29ba2946f7)
