CLIENT PAUSE may be used, in other contexts, for a long time making all
the slaves time out. Better for now to be more specific about what
should disable senidng PINGs.
An alternative to that would be to virtually refresh the slave
interactions when clients are paused, however for now I went for this
more conservative solution.
CLIENT PAUSE may be used, in other contexts, for a long time making all
the slaves time out. Better for now to be more specific about what
should disable senidng PINGs.
An alternative to that would be to virtually refresh the slave
interactions when clients are paused, however for now I went for this
more conservative solution.
In fast systems "SLOWLOG RESET" is fast enough to don't be logged even
when the time limit is "1" sometimes. Leading to false positives such
as:
[err]: SLOWLOG - can be disabled in tests/unit/slowlog.tcl
Expected '1' to be equal to '0'
In fast systems "SLOWLOG RESET" is fast enough to don't be logged even
when the time limit is "1" sometimes. Leading to false positives such
as:
[err]: SLOWLOG - can be disabled in tests/unit/slowlog.tcl
Expected '1' to be equal to '0'
Now clients that are ready to be terminated asynchronously are processed
more often in beforeSleep() instead of being processed in serverCron().
This means that the test will not be able to catch the moment the client
was terminated, also note that the 'omem' figure now changes in big
steps, because of the new client output buffers layout.
So we have to change the test range in order to accomodate for that.
Yet the test is useful enough to be worth taking, even if its precision
is reduced by this commit. Probably if we get more problems, a thing
that makes sense is just to check that the limit is < 200k. That's more
than enough actually.
Now clients that are ready to be terminated asynchronously are processed
more often in beforeSleep() instead of being processed in serverCron().
This means that the test will not be able to catch the moment the client
was terminated, also note that the 'omem' figure now changes in big
steps, because of the new client output buffers layout.
So we have to change the test range in order to accomodate for that.
Yet the test is useful enough to be worth taking, even if its precision
is reduced by this commit. Probably if we get more problems, a thing
that makes sense is just to check that the limit is < 200k. That's more
than enough actually.
