Likely fix#6723.
This is what happens AFAIK: we enter the main loop where we expire stuff
until a given percentage of keys is still found to be logically expired.
There are however other potential exit conditions.
However the "sampled" variable is not always incremented inside the
loop, because we may found no valid slot as we scan the hash table, but
just NULLs ad dict entries. So when the do/while loop condition is
triggered at the end, we do (expired*100/sampled), dividing by zero if
we sampled 0 keys.
Likely fix#6723.
This is what happens AFAIK: we enter the main loop where we expire stuff
until a given percentage of keys is still found to be logically expired.
There are however other potential exit conditions.
However the "sampled" variable is not always incremented inside the
loop, because we may found no valid slot as we scan the hash table, but
just NULLs ad dict entries. So when the do/while loop condition is
triggered at the end, we do (expired*100/sampled), dividing by zero if
we sampled 0 keys.
Likely fix#6723.
This is what happens AFAIK: we enter the main loop where we expire stuff
until a given percentage of keys is still found to be logically expired.
There are however other potential exit conditions.
However the "sampled" variable is not always incremented inside the
loop, because we may found no valid slot as we scan the hash table, but
just NULLs ad dict entries. So when the do/while loop condition is
triggered at the end, we do (expired*100/sampled), dividing by zero if
we sampled 0 keys.
Likely fix#6723.
This is what happens AFAIK: we enter the main loop where we expire stuff
until a given percentage of keys is still found to be logically expired.
There are however other potential exit conditions.
However the "sampled" variable is not always incremented inside the
loop, because we may found no valid slot as we scan the hash table, but
just NULLs ad dict entries. So when the do/while loop condition is
triggered at the end, we do (expired*100/sampled), dividing by zero if
we sampled 0 keys.
Funcion adjustOpenFilesLimit() has an implicit parameter, which is server.maxclients.
This function aims to ajust maximum file descriptor number according to server.maxclients
by best effort, which is "bestlimit" could be lower than "maxfiles" but greater than "oldlimit".
When we try to increase "maxclients" using CONFIG SET command, we could increase maximum
file descriptor number to a bigger value without calling aeResizeSetSize the same time.
When later more and more clients connect to server, the allocated fd could be bigger and bigger,
and eventually exceeds events size of aeEventLoop.events. When new nodes joins the cluster,
new link is created, together with new fd, but when calling aeCreateFileEvent, we did not
check the return value. In this case, we have a non-null "link" but the associated fd is not
registered.
So when we dynamically set "maxclients" we could reach an inconsistency between maximum file
descriptor number of the process and server.maxclients. And later could cause cluster link and link
fd inconsistency.
While setting "maxclients" dynamically, we consider it as failed when resulting "maxclients" is not
the same as expected. We try to restore back the maximum file descriptor number when we failed to set
"maxclients" to the specified value, so that server.maxclients could act as a guard as before.
Funcion adjustOpenFilesLimit() has an implicit parameter, which is server.maxclients.
This function aims to ajust maximum file descriptor number according to server.maxclients
by best effort, which is "bestlimit" could be lower than "maxfiles" but greater than "oldlimit".
When we try to increase "maxclients" using CONFIG SET command, we could increase maximum
file descriptor number to a bigger value without calling aeResizeSetSize the same time.
When later more and more clients connect to server, the allocated fd could be bigger and bigger,
and eventually exceeds events size of aeEventLoop.events. When new nodes joins the cluster,
new link is created, together with new fd, but when calling aeCreateFileEvent, we did not
check the return value. In this case, we have a non-null "link" but the associated fd is not
registered.
So when we dynamically set "maxclients" we could reach an inconsistency between maximum file
descriptor number of the process and server.maxclients. And later could cause cluster link and link
fd inconsistency.
While setting "maxclients" dynamically, we consider it as failed when resulting "maxclients" is not
the same as expected. We try to restore back the maximum file descriptor number when we failed to set
"maxclients" to the specified value, so that server.maxclients could act as a guard as before.
If a blocked module client times-out (or disconnects, unblocked
by CLIENT command, etc.) we need to call moduleUnblockClient
in order to free memory allocated by the module sub-system
and blocked-client private data
Other changes:
Made blockedonkeys.tcl tests a bit more aggressive in order
to smoke-out potential memory leaks
If a blocked module client times-out (or disconnects, unblocked
by CLIENT command, etc.) we need to call moduleUnblockClient
in order to free memory allocated by the module sub-system
and blocked-client private data
Other changes:
Made blockedonkeys.tcl tests a bit more aggressive in order
to smoke-out potential memory leaks
This commit solves the following bug:
127.0.0.1:6379> XGROUP CREATE x grp $ MKSTREAM
OK
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 666 f v
"666-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) 1) 1) "666-0"
2) 1) "f"
2) "v"
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 667 f v
"667-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XDEL x 667
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) (empty array)
The root cause is that we use s->last_id in streamCompareID
while we should use the last *valid* ID
This commit solves the following bug:
127.0.0.1:6379> XGROUP CREATE x grp $ MKSTREAM
OK
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 666 f v
"666-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) 1) 1) "666-0"
2) 1) "f"
2) "v"
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 667 f v
"667-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XDEL x 667
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) (empty array)
The root cause is that we use s->last_id in streamCompareID
while we should use the last *valid* ID
This commit solves several edge cases that are related to
exhausting the streamID limits: We should correctly calculate
the succeeding streamID instead of blindly incrementing 'seq'
This affects both XREAD and XADD.
Other (unrelated) changes:
Reply with a better error message when trying to add an entry
to a stream that has exhausted last_id
This commit solves several edge cases that are related to
exhausting the streamID limits: We should correctly calculate
the succeeding streamID instead of blindly incrementing 'seq'
This affects both XREAD and XADD.
Other (unrelated) changes:
Reply with a better error message when trying to add an entry
to a stream that has exhausted last_id
- make lua-replicate-commands mutable (it never was, but i don't see why)
- make tcp-backlog immutable (fix a recent refactory mistake)
- increase the max limit of a few configs to match what they were before
the recent refactory
- make lua-replicate-commands mutable (it never was, but i don't see why)
- make tcp-backlog immutable (fix a recent refactory mistake)
- increase the max limit of a few configs to match what they were before
the recent refactory
This bug is from the first version of Redis. Probably the problem here
is that before we used an SDS split function that created empty strings
for additional spaces, like in "SET foo bar".
AFAIK later we replaced it with the curretn sdssplitarg() API that has
no such a problem. As a result, we introduced a bug, where it is no
longer possible to do something like:
SET foo ""
Using the inline protocol. Now it is fixed.
