STRALGO should be a container for mostly read-only string
algorithms in Redis. The algorithms should have two main
characteristics:
1. They should be non trivial to compute, and often not part of
programming language standard libraries.
2. They should be fast enough that it is a good idea to have optimized C
implementations.
Next thing I would love to see? A small strings compression algorithm.
STRALGO should be a container for mostly read-only string
algorithms in Redis. The algorithms should have two main
characteristics:
1. They should be non trivial to compute, and often not part of
programming language standard libraries.
2. They should be fast enough that it is a good idea to have optimized C
implementations.
Next thing I would love to see? A small strings compression algorithm.
STRALGO should be a container for mostly read-only string
algorithms in Redis. The algorithms should have two main
characteristics:
1. They should be non trivial to compute, and often not part of
programming language standard libraries.
2. They should be fast enough that it is a good idea to have optimized C
implementations.
Next thing I would love to see? A small strings compression algorithm.
STRALGO should be a container for mostly read-only string
algorithms in Redis. The algorithms should have two main
characteristics:
1. They should be non trivial to compute, and often not part of
programming language standard libraries.
2. They should be fast enough that it is a good idea to have optimized C
implementations.
Next thing I would love to see? A small strings compression algorithm.
When deffered reply is added the previous reply node cannot be used so
all the extra space we allocated in it is wasted. in case someone uses
deffered replies in a loop, each time adding a small reply, each of
these reply nodes (the small string reply) would have consumed a 16k
block.
now when we add anther diferred reply node, we trim the unused portion
of the previous reply block.
see #7123
When deffered reply is added the previous reply node cannot be used so
all the extra space we allocated in it is wasted. in case someone uses
deffered replies in a loop, each time adding a small reply, each of
these reply nodes (the small string reply) would have consumed a 16k
block.
now when we add anther diferred reply node, we trim the unused portion
of the previous reply block.
see #7123
After all I changed idea again: enabled/disabled should have a more
clear meaning, and it only means: you can't authenticate with such user
with new connections, however old connections continue to work as
expected.
After all I changed idea again: enabled/disabled should have a more
clear meaning, and it only means: you can't authenticate with such user
with new connections, however old connections continue to work as
expected.
Now that we have an interface to use this API directly, via ACL GENPASS,
we are no longer sure what people could do with it. So why don't make it
a strong primitive exported by Redis in order to create unique IDs and
so forth?
The implementation was tested against the test vectors that can
be found in RFC4231.
Now that we have an interface to use this API directly, via ACL GENPASS,
we are no longer sure what people could do with it. So why don't make it
a strong primitive exported by Redis in order to create unique IDs and
so forth?
The implementation was tested against the test vectors that can
be found in RFC4231.
Strange enough, pthread_setname_np() produces a warning for not defined
function even if pthread is included. Moreover the MacOS documentation
claims the return value for the function is void, but actually is int.
Related to #7089.
Strange enough, pthread_setname_np() produces a warning for not defined
function even if pthread is included. Moreover the MacOS documentation
claims the return value for the function is void, but actually is int.
Related to #7089.
