Specifically, the key passed to the module aof_rewrite callback is a stack allocated robj. When passing it to RedisModule_EmitAOF (with appropriate "s" fmt string) redis used to panic when trying to inc the ref count of the stack allocated robj. Now support such robjs by coying them to a new heap robj. This doesn't affect performance because using the alternative "c" or "b" format strings also copies the input to a new heap robj.
Specifically, the key passed to the module aof_rewrite callback is a stack allocated robj. When passing it to RedisModule_EmitAOF (with appropriate "s" fmt string) redis used to panic when trying to inc the ref count of the stack allocated robj. Now support such robjs by coying them to a new heap robj. This doesn't affect performance because using the alternative "c" or "b" format strings also copies the input to a new heap robj.
in case the rdb child failed, crashed or terminated unexpectedly redis
would have marked the replica clients with repl_put_online_on_ack and
then kill them only after a minute when no ack was received.
it would not stream anything to these connections, so the only effect of
this bug is a delay of 1 minute in the replicas attempt to re-connect.
in case the rdb child failed, crashed or terminated unexpectedly redis
would have marked the replica clients with repl_put_online_on_ack and
then kill them only after a minute when no ack was received.
it would not stream anything to these connections, so the only effect of
this bug is a delay of 1 minute in the replicas attempt to re-connect.
Before this commit, the output of "./runtest-cluster --help" is incorrect.
After this commit, the format of the following 3 output is consistent:
./runtest --help
./runtest-cluster --help
./runtest-sentinel --help
Before this commit, the output of "./runtest-cluster --help" is incorrect.
After this commit, the format of the following 3 output is consistent:
./runtest --help
./runtest-cluster --help
./runtest-sentinel --help
interestingly the latency monitor test fails because valgrind is slow
enough so that the time inside PEXPIREAT command from the moment of
the first mstime() call to get the basetime until checkAlreadyExpired
calls mstime() again is more than 1ms, and that test was too sensitive.
using this opportunity to speed up the test (unrelated to the failure)
the fix is just the longer time passed to PEXPIRE.
interestingly the latency monitor test fails because valgrind is slow
enough so that the time inside PEXPIREAT command from the moment of
the first mstime() call to get the basetime until checkAlreadyExpired
calls mstime() again is more than 1ms, and that test was too sensitive.
using this opportunity to speed up the test (unrelated to the failure)
the fix is just the longer time passed to PEXPIRE.
