these metrics become negative when RSS is smaller than the used_memory.
This can easily happen when the program allocated a lot of memory and haven't
written to it yet, in which case the kernel doesn't allocate any pages to the process
these metrics become negative when RSS is smaller than the used_memory.
This can easily happen when the program allocated a lot of memory and haven't
written to it yet, in which case the kernel doesn't allocate any pages to the process
If we encounter an unsupported protocol in the "bind" list, don't
ipso-facto consider it a fatal error. We continue to abort startup if
there are no listening sockets at all.
This ensures that the lack of IPv6 support does not prevent Redis from
starting on Debian where we try to bind to the ::1 interface by default
(via "bind 127.0.0.1 ::1"). A machine with IPv6 disabled (such as some
container systems) would simply fail to start Redis after the initiall
call to apt(8).
This is similar to the case for where "bind" is not specified:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3894
... and was based on the corresponding PR:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/pull/4108
... but also adds EADDRNOTAVAIL to the list of errors to catch which I
believe is missing from there.
This issue was raised in Debian as both <https://bugs.debian.org/900284>
& <https://bugs.debian.org/914354>.
If we encounter an unsupported protocol in the "bind" list, don't
ipso-facto consider it a fatal error. We continue to abort startup if
there are no listening sockets at all.
This ensures that the lack of IPv6 support does not prevent Redis from
starting on Debian where we try to bind to the ::1 interface by default
(via "bind 127.0.0.1 ::1"). A machine with IPv6 disabled (such as some
container systems) would simply fail to start Redis after the initiall
call to apt(8).
This is similar to the case for where "bind" is not specified:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3894
... and was based on the corresponding PR:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/pull/4108
... but also adds EADDRNOTAVAIL to the list of errors to catch which I
believe is missing from there.
This issue was raised in Debian as both <https://bugs.debian.org/900284>
& <https://bugs.debian.org/914354>.
This really helps spot it in the logs, otherwise it does not look like a
warning/error. For example:
Creating Server TCP listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
... is not nearly as clear as:
Could not create server TCP listening listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
This really helps spot it in the logs, otherwise it does not look like a
warning/error. For example:
Creating Server TCP listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
... is not nearly as clear as:
Could not create server TCP listening listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
server.hz was uninitialized between initServerConfig and initServer.
this can lead to someone (e.g. queued modules) doing createObject,
and accessing an uninitialized variable, that can potentially be 0,
and lead to a crash.
server.hz was uninitialized between initServerConfig and initServer.
this can lead to someone (e.g. queued modules) doing createObject,
and accessing an uninitialized variable, that can potentially be 0,
and lead to a crash.
When HAVE_MALLOC_SIZE is false, each call to zrealloc causes used_memory
to increase by PREFIX_SIZE more than it should, due to mis-matched
accounting between the original zmalloc (which includes PREFIX size in
its increment) and zrealloc (which misses it from its decrement).
I've also supplied a command-line test to easily demonstrate the
problem. It's not wired into the test framework, because I don't know
TCL so I'm not sure how to automate it.
When HAVE_MALLOC_SIZE is false, each call to zrealloc causes used_memory
to increase by PREFIX_SIZE more than it should, due to mis-matched
accounting between the original zmalloc (which includes PREFIX size in
its increment) and zrealloc (which misses it from its decrement).
I've also supplied a command-line test to easily demonstrate the
problem. It's not wired into the test framework, because I don't know
TCL so I'm not sure how to automate it.
