Add Linux kernel OOM killer control option.
This adds the ability to control the Linux OOM killer oom_score_adj
parameter for all Redis processes, depending on the process role (i.e.
master, replica, background child).
A oom-score-adj global boolean flag control this feature. In addition,
specific values can be configured using oom-score-adj-values if
additional tuning is required.
This is a rebased version of #3078 originally by shaharmor
with the following patches by TysonAndre made after rebasing
to work with the updated C API:
1. Add 2 more unit tests
(wrong argument count error message, integer over 64 bits)
2. Use addReplyArrayLen instead of addReplyMultiBulkLen.
3. Undo changes to src/help.h - for the ZMSCORE PR,
I heard those should instead be automatically
generated from the redis-doc repo if it gets updated
Motivations:
- Example use case: Client code to efficiently check if each element of a set
of 1000 items is a member of a set of 10 million items.
(Similar to reasons for working on #7593)
- HMGET and ZMSCORE already exist. This may lead to developers deciding
to implement functionality that's best suited to a regular set with a
data type of sorted set or hash map instead, for the multi-get support.
Currently, multi commands or lua scripting to call sismember multiple times
would almost definitely be less efficient than a native smismember
for the following reasons:
- Need to fetch the set from the string every time
instead of reusing the C pointer.
- Using pipelining or multi-commands would result in more bytes sent
and received by the client for the repeated SISMEMBER KEY sections.
- Need to specially encode the data and decode it from the client
for lua-based solutions.
- Proposed solutions using Lua or SADD/SDIFF could trigger writes to
memory, which is undesirable on a redis replica server
or when commands get replicated to replicas.
Co-Authored-By: Shahar Mor <shahar@peer5.com>
Co-Authored-By: Tyson Andre <tysonandre775@hotmail.com>
Before this fix we where attempting to select a db before creating db the DB, see: #7323
This issue doesn't seem to have any implications, since the selected DB index is 0,
the db pointer remains NULL, and will later be correctly set before using this dummy
client for the first time.
As we know, we call 'moduleInitModulesSystem()' before 'initServer()'. We will allocate
memory for server.db in 'initServer', but we call 'createClient()' that will call 'selectDb()'
in 'moduleInitModulesSystem()', before the databases where created. Instead, we should call
'createClient()' for moduleFreeContextReusedClient after 'initServer()'.
Diskless master has some inherent latencies.
1) fork starts with delay from cron rather than immediately
2) replica is put online only after an ACK. but the ACK
was sent only once a second.
3) but even if it would arrive immediately, it will not
register in case cron didn't yet detect that the fork is done.
Besides that, when a replica disconnects, it doesn't immediately
attempts to re-connect, it waits for replication cron (one per second).
in case it was already online, it may be important to try to re-connect
as soon as possible, so that the backlog at the master doesn't vanish.
In case it disconnected during rdb transfer, one can argue that it's
not very important to re-connect immediately, but this is needed for the
"diskless loading short read" test to be able to run 100 iterations in 5
seconds, rather than 3 (waiting for replication cron re-connection)
changes in this commit:
1) sync command starts a fork immediately if no sync_delay is configured
2) replica sends REPLCONF ACK when done reading the rdb (rather than on 1s cron)
3) when a replica unexpectedly disconnets, it immediately tries to
re-connect rather than waiting 1s
4) when when a child exits, if there is another replica waiting, we spawn a new
one right away, instead of waiting for 1s replicationCron.
5) added a call to connectWithMaster from replicationSetMaster. which is called
from the REPLICAOF command but also in 3 places in cluster.c, in all of
these the connection attempt will now be immediate instead of delayed by 1
second.
side note:
we can add a call to rdbPipeReadHandler in replconfCommand when getting
a REPLCONF ACK from the replica to solve a race where the replica got
the entire rdb and EOF marker before we detected that the pipe was
closed.
in the test i did see this race happens in one about of some 300 runs,
but i concluded that this race is unlikely in real life (where the
replica is on another host and we're more likely to first detect the
pipe was closed.
the test runs 100 iterations in 3 seconds, so in some cases it'll take 4
seconds instead (waiting for another REPLCONF ACK).
Removing unneeded startBgsaveForReplication from updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave
Now that CheckChildrenDone is calling the new replicationStartPendingFork
(extracted from serverCron) there's actually no need to call
startBgsaveForReplication from updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave anymore,
since as soon as updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave returns, CheckChildrenDone is
calling replicationStartPendingFork that handles that anyway.
The code in updateSlavesWaitingForBgsave had a bug in which it ignored
repl-diskless-sync-delay, but removing that code shows that this bug was
hiding another bug, which is that the max_idle should have used >= and
not >, this one second delay has a big impact on my new test.
This makes it possible to add tests that generate assertions, and run
them with valgrind, making sure that there are no memory violations
prior to the assertion.
New config options:
- crash-log-enabled - can be disabled for cleaner core dumps
- crash-memcheck-enabled - useful for faster termination after a crash
- use-exit-on-panic - to be used by the test suite so that valgrind can
detect leaks and memory corruptions
Other changes:
- Crash log is printed even on system that dont HAVE_BACKTRACE, i.e. in
both SIGSEGV and assert / panic
- Assertion and panic won't print registers and code around EIP (which
was useless), but will do fast memory test (which may still indicate
that the assertion was due to memory corrpution)
I had to reshuffle code in order to re-use it, so i extracted come code
into function without actually doing any changes to the code:
- logServerInfo
- logModulesInfo
- doFastMemoryTest (with the exception of it being conditional)
- dumpCodeAroundEIP
changes to the crash report on segfault:
- logRegisters is called right after the stack trace (before info) done
just in order to have more re-usable code
- stack trace skips the first two items on the stack (the crash log and
signal handler functions)
Syntax: `ZMSCORE KEY MEMBER [MEMBER ...]`
This is an extension of #2359
amended by Tyson Andre to work with the changed unstable API,
add more tests, and consistently return an array.
- It seemed as if it would be more likely to get reviewed
after updating the implementation.
Currently, multi commands or lua scripting to call zscore multiple times
would almost definitely be less efficient than a native ZMSCORE
for the following reasons:
- Need to fetch the set from the string every time instead of reusing the C
pointer.
- Using pipelining or multi-commands would result in more bytes sent by
the client for the repeated `ZMSCORE KEY` sections.
- Need to specially encode the data and decode it from the client
for lua-based solutions.
- The fastest solution I've seen for large sets(thousands or millions)
involves lua and a variadic ZADD, then a ZINTERSECT, then a ZRANGE 0 -1,
then UNLINK of a temporary set (or lua). This is still inefficient.
Co-authored-by: Tyson Andre <tysonandre775@hotmail.com>
Similarly to EXPIREAT with TTL in the past, which implicitly deletes the
key and return success, RESTORE should not store key that are already
expired into the db.
When used together with REPLACE it should emit a DEL to keyspace
notification and replication stream.
(cherry picked from commit 1c35f8741baa0def2f87eeab17898c79f0147d11)
In order to support the use of multi-exec in pipeline, it is important that
MULTI and EXEC are never rejected and it is easy for the client to know if the
connection is still in multi state.
It was easy to make sure MULTI and DISCARD never fail (done by previous
commits) since these only change the client state and don't do any actual
change in the server, but EXEC is a different story.
Since in the past, it was possible for clients to handle some EXEC errors and
retry the EXEC, we now can't affort to return any error on EXEC other than
EXECABORT, which now carries with it the real reason for the abort too.
Other fixes in this commit:
- Some checks that where performed at the time of queuing need to be re-
validated when EXEC runs, for instance if the transaction contains writes
commands, it needs to be aborted. there was one check that was already done
in execCommand (-READONLY), but other checks where missing: -OOM, -MISCONF,
-NOREPLICAS, -MASTERDOWN
- When a command is rejected by processCommand it was rejected with addReply,
which was not recognized as an error in case the bad command came from the
master. this will enable to count or MONITOR these errors in the future.
- make it easier for tests to create additional (non deferred) clients.
- add tests for the fixes of this commit.
(cherry picked from commit fe8d6fe74920798c146a587810ee91ff049a9093)
Similarly to EXPIREAT with TTL in the past, which implicitly deletes the
key and return success, RESTORE should not store key that are already
expired into the db.
When used together with REPLACE it should emit a DEL to keyspace
notification and replication stream.
1. fix cases where null pointer might be accessed
2. make assignmnet op safe
3. make operator bool explicit (safe bool idiom)
4. make comparison operators symetric
fix robj_sharedptr use in rdb.cpp
Former-commit-id: ede524c0647c0875f1071978f26ff785c8d1183e
In order to support the use of multi-exec in pipeline, it is important that
MULTI and EXEC are never rejected and it is easy for the client to know if the
connection is still in multi state.
It was easy to make sure MULTI and DISCARD never fail (done by previous
commits) since these only change the client state and don't do any actual
change in the server, but EXEC is a different story.
Since in the past, it was possible for clients to handle some EXEC errors and
retry the EXEC, we now can't affort to return any error on EXEC other than
EXECABORT, which now carries with it the real reason for the abort too.
Other fixes in this commit:
- Some checks that where performed at the time of queuing need to be re-
validated when EXEC runs, for instance if the transaction contains writes
commands, it needs to be aborted. there was one check that was already done
in execCommand (-READONLY), but other checks where missing: -OOM, -MISCONF,
-NOREPLICAS, -MASTERDOWN
- When a command is rejected by processCommand it was rejected with addReply,
which was not recognized as an error in case the bad command came from the
master. this will enable to count or MONITOR these errors in the future.
- make it easier for tests to create additional (non deferred) clients.
- add tests for the fixes of this commit.
The `LRANK` command returns the index (position) of a given element
within a list. Using the `direction` argument it is possible to specify
going from head to tail (acending, 1) or from tail to head (decending,
-1). Only the first found index is returend. The complexity is O(N).
When using lists as a queue it can be of interest at what position a
given element is, for instance to monitor a job processing through a
work queue. This came up within the Python `rq` project which is based
on Redis[0].
[0]: https://github.com/rq/rq/issues/1197
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren <mail@aparcar.org>
The `LRANK` command returns the index (position) of a given element
within a list. Using the `direction` argument it is possible to specify
going from head to tail (acending, 1) or from tail to head (decending,
-1). Only the first found index is returend. The complexity is O(N).
When using lists as a queue it can be of interest at what position a
given element is, for instance to monitor a job processing through a
work queue. This came up within the Python `rq` project which is based
on Redis[0].
[0]: https://github.com/rq/rq/issues/1197
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren <mail@aparcar.org>
After a closer look, the Redis core devleopers all believe that this was
too fragile, caused many bugs that we didn't expect and that were very
hard to track. Better to find an alternative solution that is simpler.
After a closer look, the Redis core devleopers all believe that this was
too fragile, caused many bugs that we didn't expect and that were very
hard to track. Better to find an alternative solution that is simpler.
