6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amit Nagler
6cb86fff51
Fix dual-channel replication test under valgrind (#904)
Test dual-channel-replication primary gets cob overrun during replica
rdb load` fails during the Valgrind run. This is due to the load
handlers disconnecting before the tests complete, resulting in a low
primary COB. Increasing the handlers' timeout should resolve this issue.

Failure:
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/actions/runs/10361286333/job/28681321393

Server logs reveals that the load handler clients were disconnected
before the test started

Also the two previus test took about 20 seconds which is the handler
timeout.

---------

Signed-off-by: naglera <anagler123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
2024-08-13 10:40:19 -07:00
naglera
27fce29500
Fix dual-channel-replication related issues (#837)
- Fix TLS bug where connection were shutdown by primary's main process
while the child process was still writing- causing main process to be
blocked.
- TLS connection fix -file descriptors are set to blocking mode in the
main thread, followed by a blocking write. This sets the file
descriptors to non-blocking if TLS is used (see `connTLSSyncWrite()`)
(@xbasel).
- Improve the reliability of dual-channel tests. Modify the pause
mechanism to verify process status directly, rather than relying on log.
- Ensure that `server.repl_offset` and `server.replid` are updated
correctly when dual channel synchronization completes successfully.
Thist led to failures in replication tests that validate replication IDs
or compare replication offsets.

---------

Signed-off-by: naglera <anagler123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: naglera <58042354+naglera@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: xbasel <103044017+xbasel@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: ranshid <88133677+ranshid@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xbasel <103044017+xbasel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
2024-08-12 13:03:12 -07:00
Binbin
929283fc6f
Dual channel replication should not update lastbgsave_status when transfer error (#811)
Currently lastbgsave_status is used in bgsave or disk-replication,
and the target is the disk. In #60, we update it when transfer error,
i think it is mainly used in tests, so we can use log to replace it.

It changes lastbgsave_status to err in this case, but it is strange
that it does not set ok or err in the above if and the following else.
Also noted this will affect stop-writes-on-bgsave-error.

Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
2024-08-12 11:25:55 -07:00
naglera
9211aed72e
Improve reliability of dual-channel-replication pause resume tests (#835)
Update the dual channel-replication tests to wait for the pause to begin
before attempting to unpause.

---------

Signed-off-by: naglera <anagler123@gmail.com>
2024-07-28 11:14:56 -07:00
naglera
48ca2c9176
Improve dual channel replication stability and fix compatibility issues (#804)
Introduce several improvements to improve the stability of dual-channel
replication and fix compatibility issues.

1. Make dual-channel-replication tests more reliable: use pause instead
of forced sleep.
2. Fix race conditions when freeing RDB client.
3. Check if sync was stopped during local buffer streaming.
4. Fix $ENDOFFSET reply format to work on 32-bit machines too.

---------

Signed-off-by: naglera <anagler123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
2024-07-25 09:34:39 -07:00
naglera
ff6b780fe6
Dual channel replication (#60)
In this PR we introduce the main benefit of dual channel replication by
continuously steaming the COB (client output buffers) in parallel to the
RDB and thus keeping the primary's side COB small AND accelerating the
overall sync process. By streaming the replication data to the replica
during the full sync, we reduce
1. Memory load from the primary's node.
2. CPU load from the primary's main process. [Latest performance
tests](#data)

## Motivation
* Reduce primary memory load. We do that by moving the COB tracking to
the replica side. This also decrease the chance for COB overruns. Note
that primary's input buffer limits at the replica side are less
restricted then primary's COB as the replica plays less critical part in
the replication group. While increasing the primary’s COB may end up
with primary reaching swap and clients suffering, at replica side we’re
more at ease with it. Larger COB means better chance to sync
successfully.
* Reduce primary main process CPU load. By opening a new, dedicated
connection for the RDB transfer, child processes can have direct access
to the new connection. Due to TLS connection restrictions, this was not
possible using one main connection. We eliminate the need for the child
process to use the primary's child-proc -> main-proc pipeline, thus
freeing up the main process to process clients queries.


 ## Dual Channel Replication high level interface design
- Dual channel replication begins when the replica sends a `REPLCONF
CAPA DUALCHANNEL` to the primary during initial
handshake. This is used to state that the replica is capable of dual
channel sync and that this is the replica's main channel, which is not
used for snapshot transfer.
- When replica lacks sufficient data for PSYNC, the primary will send
`-FULLSYNCNEEDED` response instead
of RDB data. As a next step, the replica creates a new connection
(rdb-channel) and configures it against
the primary with the appropriate capabilities and requirements. The
replica then requests a sync
     using the RDB channel. 
- Prior to forking, the primary sends the replica the snapshot's end
repl-offset, and attaches the replica
to the replication backlog to keep repl data until the replica requests
psync. The replica uses the main
     channel to request a PSYNC starting at the snapshot end offset. 
- The primary main threads sends incremental changes via the main
channel, while the bgsave process
sends the RDB directly to the replica via the rdb-channel. As for the
replica, the incremental
changes are stored on a local buffer, while the RDB is loaded into
memory.
- Once the replica completes loading the rdb, it drops the
rdb-connection and streams the accumulated incremental
     changes into memory. Repl steady state continues normally.

## New replica state machine


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/38fbfff0-60b9-4066-8b13-becdb87babc3)





## Data <a name="data"></a>

![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d73631a7-0a58-4958-a494-a7f4add9108f)


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f44936ed-c59a-4223-905d-0fe48a6d31a6)


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd333ee2-3c47-47e5-b244-4ea75f77c836)

## Explanation 
These graphs demonstrate performance improvements during full sync
sessions using rdb-channel + streaming rdb directly from the background
process to the replica.

First graph- with at most 50 clients and light weight commands, we saw
5%-7.5% improvement in write latency during sync session.
Two graphs below- full sync was tested during heavy read commands from
the primary (such as sdiff, sunion on large sets). In that case, the
child process writes to the replica without sharing CPU with the loaded
main process. As a result, this not only improves client response time,
but may also shorten sync time by about 50%. The shorter sync time
results in less memory being used to store replication diffs (>60% in
some of the tested cases).

## Test setup 
Both primary and replica in the performance tests ran on the same
machine. RDB size in all tests is 3.7gb. I generated write load using
valkey-benchmark ` ./valkey-benchmark -r 100000 -n 6000000 lpush my_list
__rand_int__`.

---------

Signed-off-by: naglera <anagler123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: naglera <58042354+naglera@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Viktor Söderqvist <viktor.soderqvist@est.tech>
Co-authored-by: Ping Xie <pingxie@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
2024-07-17 13:59:33 -07:00