Add Linux kernel OOM killer control option.
This adds the ability to control the Linux OOM killer oom_score_adj
parameter for all Redis processes, depending on the process role (i.e.
master, replica, background child).
A oom-score-adj global boolean flag control this feature. In addition,
specific values can be configured using oom-score-adj-values if
additional tuning is required.
(cherry picked from commit 2530dc0ebd8be8d792f4673073401377cd5bdc42)
besides, hooks test was time sensitive. when the replica managed to
reconnect quickly after the client kill, the test would fail
(cherry picked from commit f7e77759902aa19cfa537ed454e6bc987498e8c5)
in case the rdb child failed, crashed or terminated unexpectedly redis
would have marked the replica clients with repl_put_online_on_ack and
then kill them only after a minute when no ack was received.
it would not stream anything to these connections, so the only effect of
this bug is a delay of 1 minute in the replicas attempt to re-connect.
(cherry picked from commit a176cb56a3c0235adddde33fcbaee2369a5af73e)
After a closer look, the Redis core devleopers all believe that this was
too fragile, caused many bugs that we didn't expect and that were very
hard to track. Better to find an alternative solution that is simpler.
After adjustMeaningfulReplOffset(), all the other related variable
should be updated, including server.second_replid_offset.
Or the old version redis like 5.0 may receive wrong data from
replication stream, cause redis 5.0 can sync with redis 6.0,
but doesn't know meaningful offset.
Otherwise we run into that:
Backtrace:
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(logStackTrace+0x45)[0x479035]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(sigsegvHandler+0xb9)[0x4797f9]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x11390)[0x7fd373c5e390]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(_serverAssert+0x6a)[0x47660a]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(freeReplicationBacklog+0x42)[0x451282]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322[0x4552d4]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322[0x4c5593]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(aeProcessEvents+0x2e6)[0x42e786]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(aeMain+0x1d)[0x42eb0d]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(main+0x4c5)[0x42b145]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf0)[0x7fd3738a3830]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(_start+0x29)[0x42b409]
Since we disconnect all the replicas and free the replication backlog in
certain replication paths, and the code that will free the replication
backlog expects that no replica is connected.
However we still need to free the replicas asynchronously in certain
cases, as documented in the top comment of disconnectSlaves().
Citing from the issue:
btw I suggest we change this fix to something else:
* We revert the fix.
* We add a call that disconnects chained replicas in the place where we trim the replica (that is a master i this case) offset.
This way we can avoid disconnections when there is no trimming of the backlog.
Note that we now want to disconnect replicas asynchronously in
disconnectSlaves(), because it's in general safer now that we can call
it from freeClient(). Otherwise for instance the command:
CLIENT KILL TYPE master
May crash: clientCommand() starts running the linked of of clients,
looking for clients to kill. However it finds the master, kills it
calling freeClient(), but this in turn calls replicationCacheMaster()
that may also call disconnectSlaves() now. So the linked list iterator
of the clientCommand() will no longer be valid.
This was broken in 1a7cd2c: we identified a crash in the CI, what
was happening before the fix should be like that:
1. The client gets in the async free list.
2. However freeClient() gets called again against the same client
which is a master.
3. The client arrived in freeClient() with the CLOSE_ASAP flag set.
4. The master gets cached, but NOT removed from the CLOSE_ASAP linked
list.
5. The master client that was cached was immediately removed since it
was still in the list.
6. Redis accessed a freed cached master.
This is how the crash looked like:
=== REDIS BUG REPORT START: Cut & paste starting from here ===
1092:S 16 May 2020 11:44:09.731 # Redis 999.999.999 crashed by signal: 11
1092:S 16 May 2020 11:44:09.731 # Crashed running the instruction at: 0x447e18
1092:S 16 May 2020 11:44:09.731 # Accessing address: 0xffffffffffffffff
1092:S 16 May 2020 11:44:09.731 # Failed assertion: (:0)
------ STACK TRACE ------
EIP:
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21300(readQueryFromClient+0x48)[0x447e18]
And the 0xffff address access likely comes from accessing an SDS that is
set to NULL (we go -1 offset to read the header).
The context is issue #7205: since the introduction of threaded I/O we close
clients asynchronously by default from readQueryFromClient(). So we
should no longer prevent the caching of the master client, to later
PSYNC incrementally, if such flags are set. However we also don't want
the master client to be cached with such flags (would be closed
immediately after being restored). And yet we want a way to understand
if a master was closed because of a protocol error, and in that case
prevent the caching.
Now both master and replicas keep track of the last replication offset
that contains meaningful data (ignoring the tailing pings), and both
trim that tail from the replication backlog, and the offset with which
they try to use for psync.
the implication is that if someone missed some pings, or even have
excessive pings that the promoted replica has, it'll still be able to
psync (avoid full sync).
the downside (which was already committed) is that replicas running old
code may fail to psync, since the promoted replica trims pings form it's
backlog.
This commit adds a test that reproduces several cases of promotions and
demotions with stale and non-stale pings
Background:
The mearningful offset on the master was added recently to solve a problem were
the master is left all alone, injecting PINGs into it's backlog when no one is
listening and then gets demoted and tries to replicate from a replica that didn't
have any of the PINGs (or at least not the last ones).
however, consider this case:
master A has two replicas (B and C) replicating directly from it.
there's no traffic at all, and also no network issues, just many pings in the
tail of the backlog. now B gets promoted, A becomes a replica of B, and C
remains a replica of A. when A gets demoted, it trims the pings from its
backlog, and successfully replicate from B. however, C is still aware of
these PINGs, when it'll disconnect and re-connect to A, it'll ask for something
that's not in the backlog anymore (since A trimmed the tail of it's backlog),
and be forced to do a full sync (something it didn't have to do before the
meaningful offset fix).
Besides that, the psync2 test was always failing randomly here and there, it
turns out the reason were PINGs. Investigating it shows the following scenario:
cycle 1: redis #1 is master, and all the rest are direct replicas of #1
cycle 2: redis #2 is promoted to master, #1 is a replica of #2 and #3 is replica of #1
now we see that when #1 is demoted it prints:
17339:S 21 Apr 2020 11:16:38.523 * Using the meaningful offset 3929963 instead of 3929977 to exclude the final PINGs (14 bytes difference)
17339:S 21 Apr 2020 11:16:39.391 * Trying a partial resynchronization (request e2b3f8817735fdfe5fa4626766daa938b61419e5:3929964).
17339:S 21 Apr 2020 11:16:39.392 * Successful partial resynchronization with master.
and when #3 connects to the demoted #2, #2 says:
17339:S 21 Apr 2020 11:16:40.084 * Partial resynchronization not accepted: Requested offset for secondary ID was 3929978, but I can reply up to 3929964
so the issue here is that the meaningful offset feature saved the day for the
demoted master (since it needs to sync from a replica that didn't get the last
ping), but it didn't help one of the other replicas which did get the last ping.
A very commonly signaled operational problem with Redis master-replicas
sets is that, once the master becomes unavailable for some reason,
especially because of network problems, many times it wont be able to
perform a partial resynchronization with the new master, once it rejoins
the partition, for the following reason:
1. The master becomes isolated, however it keeps sending PINGs to the
replicas. Such PINGs will never be received since the link connection is
actually already severed.
2. On the other side, one of the replicas will turn into the new master,
setting its secondary replication ID offset to the one of the last
command received from the old master: this offset will not include the
PINGs sent by the master once the link was already disconnected.
3. When the master rejoins the partion and is turned into a replica, its
offset will be too advanced because of the PINGs, so a PSYNC will fail,
and a full synchronization will be required.
Related to issue #7002 and other discussion we had in the past around
this problem.
"Partial Resynchronization" is a special variant of replication success
that we have to tell systemd about if it is managing redis-server via a
Type=Notify service unit.
1. Call emptyDb even in case of diskless-load: We want modules
to get the same FLUSHDB event as disk-based replication.
2. Do not fire any module events when flushing the backups array.
3. Delete redundant call to signalFlushedDb (Called from emptyDb).
Instead of replicating a subset of libsystemd's sd_notify(3) internally,
use the dynamic library provided by systemd to communicate with the
service manager.
When systemd supervision was auto-detected or configured, communicate
the actual server status (i.e. "Loading dataset", "Waiting for
master<->replica sync") to systemd, instead of declaring readiness right
after initializing the server process.
* replication hooks: role change, master link status, replica online/offline
* persistence hooks: saving, loading, loading progress
* misc hooks: cron loop, shutdown, module loaded/unloaded
* change the way hooks test work, and add tests for all of the above
startLoading() now gets flag indicating what is loaded.
stopLoading() now gets an indication of success or failure.
adding startSaving() and stopSaving() with similar args and role.
This is what happened:
1. Instance starts, is a slave in the cluster configuration, but
actually server.masterhost is not set, so technically the instance
is acting like a master.
2. loadDataFromDisk() calls replicationCacheMasterUsingMyself() even if
the instance is a master, in the case it is logically a slave and the
cluster is enabled. So now we have a cached master even if the instance
is practically configured as a master (from the POV of
server.masterhost value and so forth).
3. clusterCron() sees that the instance requires to replicate from its
master, because logically it is a slave, so it calls
replicationSetMaster() that will in turn call
replicationCacheMasterUsingMyself(): before this commit, this call would
overwrite the old cached master, creating a memory leak.
misc:
- handle SSL_has_pending by iterating though these in beforeSleep, and setting timeout of 0 to aeProcessEvents
- fix issue with epoll signaling EPOLLHUP and EPOLLERR only to the write handlers. (needed to detect the rdb pipe was closed)
- add key-load-delay config for testing
- trim connShutdown which is no longer needed
- rioFdsetWrite -> rioFdWrite - simplified since there's no longer need to write to multiple FDs
- don't detect rdb child exited (don't call wait3) until we detect the pipe is closed
- Cleanup bad optimization from rio.c, add another one
* Introduce a connection abstraction layer for all socket operations and
integrate it across the code base.
* Provide an optional TLS connections implementation based on OpenSSL.
* Pull a newer version of hiredis with TLS support.
* Tests, redis-cli updates for TLS support.
