65a3307bc (released in 6.0.6) has a side effect, when processCommand
rejects a command with pre-made shared object error string, it trims the
newlines from the end of the string. if that string is later used with
addReply, the newline will be missing, breaking the protocol, and
leaving the client hung.
It seems that the only scenario which this happens is when replying with
-LOADING to some command, and later using that reply from the CONFIG
SET command (still during loading). this will result in hung client.
Refactoring the code in order to avoid trimming these newlines from
shared string objects, and do the newline trimming only in other cases
where it's needed.
Co-authored-by: Guy Benoish <guy.benoish@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9fcd9e191e6f54276688fb7c74e1d5c3c4be9a75)
After fork, the child process(redis-aof-rewrite) will get the fd opened
by the parent process(redis), when redis killed by kill -9, it will not
graceful exit(call prepareForShutdown()), so redis-aof-rewrite thread may still
alive, the fd(lock) will still be held by redis-aof-rewrite thread, and
redis restart will fail to get lock, means fail to start.
This issue was causing failures in the cluster tests in github actions.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit cbaf3c5bbafd43e009a2d6b38dd0e9fc450a3e12)
Adds an `optional` value to the previously boolean `tls-auth-clients` configuration keyword.
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f31260b0445f5649449da41555e1272a40ae4af7)
Similarly to EXPIREAT with TTL in the past, which implicitly deletes the
key and return success, RESTORE should not store key that are already
expired into the db.
When used together with REPLACE it should emit a DEL to keyspace
notification and replication stream.
(cherry picked from commit 5977a94842a25140520297fe4bfda15e0e4de711)
In order to support the use of multi-exec in pipeline, it is important that
MULTI and EXEC are never rejected and it is easy for the client to know if the
connection is still in multi state.
It was easy to make sure MULTI and DISCARD never fail (done by previous
commits) since these only change the client state and don't do any actual
change in the server, but EXEC is a different story.
Since in the past, it was possible for clients to handle some EXEC errors and
retry the EXEC, we now can't affort to return any error on EXEC other than
EXECABORT, which now carries with it the real reason for the abort too.
Other fixes in this commit:
- Some checks that where performed at the time of queuing need to be re-
validated when EXEC runs, for instance if the transaction contains writes
commands, it needs to be aborted. there was one check that was already done
in execCommand (-READONLY), but other checks where missing: -OOM, -MISCONF,
-NOREPLICAS, -MASTERDOWN
- When a command is rejected by processCommand it was rejected with addReply,
which was not recognized as an error in case the bad command came from the
master. this will enable to count or MONITOR these errors in the future.
- make it easier for tests to create additional (non deferred) clients.
- add tests for the fixes of this commit.
(cherry picked from commit 65a3307bc95aadbc91d85cdf9dfbe1b3493222ca)
1. fix cases where null pointer might be accessed
2. make assignmnet op safe
3. make operator bool explicit (safe bool idiom)
4. make comparison operators symetric
fix robj_sharedptr use in rdb.cpp
Former-commit-id: ede524c0647c0875f1071978f26ff785c8d1183e
The `LRANK` command returns the index (position) of a given element
within a list. Using the `direction` argument it is possible to specify
going from head to tail (acending, 1) or from tail to head (decending,
-1). Only the first found index is returend. The complexity is O(N).
When using lists as a queue it can be of interest at what position a
given element is, for instance to monitor a job processing through a
work queue. This came up within the Python `rq` project which is based
on Redis[0].
[0]: https://github.com/rq/rq/issues/1197
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren <mail@aparcar.org>
After a closer look, the Redis core devleopers all believe that this was
too fragile, caused many bugs that we didn't expect and that were very
hard to track. Better to find an alternative solution that is simpler.
Otherwise we run into that:
Backtrace:
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(logStackTrace+0x45)[0x479035]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(sigsegvHandler+0xb9)[0x4797f9]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x11390)[0x7fd373c5e390]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(_serverAssert+0x6a)[0x47660a]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(freeReplicationBacklog+0x42)[0x451282]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322[0x4552d4]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322[0x4c5593]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(aeProcessEvents+0x2e6)[0x42e786]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(aeMain+0x1d)[0x42eb0d]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(main+0x4c5)[0x42b145]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf0)[0x7fd3738a3830]
src/redis-server 127.0.0.1:21322(_start+0x29)[0x42b409]
Since we disconnect all the replicas and free the replication backlog in
certain replication paths, and the code that will free the replication
backlog expects that no replica is connected.
However we still need to free the replicas asynchronously in certain
cases, as documented in the top comment of disconnectSlaves().
