A very commonly signaled operational problem with Redis master-replicas
sets is that, once the master becomes unavailable for some reason,
especially because of network problems, many times it wont be able to
perform a partial resynchronization with the new master, once it rejoins
the partition, for the following reason:
1. The master becomes isolated, however it keeps sending PINGs to the
replicas. Such PINGs will never be received since the link connection is
actually already severed.
2. On the other side, one of the replicas will turn into the new master,
setting its secondary replication ID offset to the one of the last
command received from the old master: this offset will not include the
PINGs sent by the master once the link was already disconnected.
3. When the master rejoins the partion and is turned into a replica, its
offset will be too advanced because of the PINGs, so a PSYNC will fail,
and a full synchronization will be required.
Related to issue #7002 and other discussion we had in the past around
this problem.
Former-commit-id: 5d6e8fe3e3e43162f0c57f580b6e8432274fca30
"Partial Resynchronization" is a special variant of replication success
that we have to tell systemd about if it is managing redis-server via a
Type=Notify service unit.
Former-commit-id: dd9502f373eb7e32aee69a30dcb521bea3ccd3ad
1. Call emptyDb even in case of diskless-load: We want modules
to get the same FLUSHDB event as disk-based replication.
2. Do not fire any module events when flushing the backups array.
3. Delete redundant call to signalFlushedDb (Called from emptyDb).
Former-commit-id: aa8a3077a2d20e66e34f72f2860d0cc3daad496e
Streams items are similar to dictionaries, however they preserve both
the order, and allow for duplicated field names. So a map is not a
semantically sounding way to deal with this.
https://twitter.com/antirez/status/1248261087553880069
Reloading of the RDB generated by
DEBUG POPULATE 5000000
SAVE
is now 25% faster.
This commit also prepares the ability to have more flexibility when
loading stuff from the RDB, since we no longer use dbAdd() but can
control exactly how things are added in the database.
Related to #5145.
Design note: clients may change type when they turn into replicas or are
moved into the Pub/Sub category and so forth. Moreover the recomputation
of the bytes used is problematic for obvious reasons: it changes
continuously, so as a conservative way to avoid accumulating errors,
each client remembers the contribution it gave to the sum, and removes
it when it is freed or before updating it with the new memory usage.
Initially they needed to be at the end so that we could extend to N
strings in the future, but after further consideration I no longer
believe it's worth it.
