When using TLS with a Redis.conf file the line for TLS reading tls-cert-file redis.crt tls-key-file redis.key is interpreted as one complete directive. I am separating this on two separate lines to improve usability so users do not get the below error.
ubuntu@ip-172-31-29-250:~/redis-6.0-rc1$ ./src/redis-server redis.conf
*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 145
>>> 'tls-cert-file redis.crt tls-key-file redis.key'
wrong number of arguments
ubuntu@ip-172-31-29-250:~/redis-6.0-rc1$ vi redis.conf
ubuntu@ip-172-31-29-250:~/redis-6.0-rc1$ ./src/redis-server redis.conf
23085:C 04 Mar 2020 01:58:12.631 # oO0OoO0OoO0Oo Redis is starting oO0OoO0OoO0Oo
23085:C 04 Mar 2020 01:58:12.631 # Redis version=5.9.101, bits=64, commit=00000000, modified=0, pid=23085, just started
23085:C 04 Mar 2020 01:58:12.631 # Configuration loaded
23085:M 04 Mar 2020 01:58:12.632 * Increased maximum number of open files to 10032 (it was originally set to 1024).
"Partial Resynchronization" is a special variant of replication success
that we have to tell systemd about if it is managing redis-server via a
Type=Notify service unit.
*** [err]: PSYNC2: total sum of full synchronizations is exactly 4 in tests/integration/psync2.tcl
Expected 5 == 4 (context: type eval line 6 cmd {assert {$sum == 4}} proc ::test)
issue was that sometime the test got an unexpected full sync since it
tried to switch to the replica before it was in sync with it's master.
The callback approach we took is very efficient, the module can do any
filtering of keys without building any list and cloning strings, it can
also read data from the key's value. but if the user tries to re-open
the key, or any other key, this can cause dict re-hashing (dictFind does
that), and that's very bad to do from inside dictScan.
this commit protects the dict from doing any rehashing during scan, but
also warns the user not to attempt any writes or command calls from
within the callback, for fear of unexpected side effects and crashes.
This makes simpler to give people help when posting such kind of errors
in the mailing list or other help forums, because sometimes the
directive looks well spelled, but the version of Redis they are using is
not able to support it.
