gvsafronov/futriix
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Sentinel: don't start a failover as leader if there is no good slave.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
antirez 2012-07-26 12:09:40 +02:00
parent baace5fc42
commit ce7b838fb9
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
src/sentinel.c
View File

@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ void sentinelKillLink(sentinelRedisInstance *ri, redisAsyncContext *c);
const char *sentinelRedisInstanceTypeStr(sentinelRedisInstance *ri);
void sentinelAbortFailover(sentinelRedisInstance *ri);
void sentinelEvent(int level, char *type, sentinelRedisInstance *ri, const char *fmt, ...);
sentinelRedisInstance *sentinelSelectSlave(sentinelRedisInstance *master);
/* ========================= Dictionary types =============================== */
@ -2061,7 +2062,11 @@ void sentinelStartFailover(sentinelRedisInstance *master) {
SRI_RECONF_SENT);
}
} else {
/* Brand new failover as SRI_FAILOVER_IN_PROGRESS was not set. */
/* Brand new failover as SRI_FAILOVER_IN_PROGRESS was not set.
*
* Do we have a slave to promote? Otherwise don't start a failover
* at all. */
if (sentinelSelectSlave(master) == NULL) return;
master->failover_state = SENTINEL_FAILOVER_STATE_WAIT_START;
}